Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Phelan Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$975kReligion$271kHousing & Shelter$207kHealth$180kEducation$45kFood & Nutrition$11kInternational$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $122k
  • $250k+3 grants · $975k
$325,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES FOUNDATION$325,000
BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$325,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$325,000
ST PIUS X$122,315
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$520k · 5 repeat orgs$861k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$520k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+38%

Still filing today

20%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $772k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROSEARY HILL HOME
    2× · 2018–2019 · $200k
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $180k · revenue +17%
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k

Funded once

  • TH
    TOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -99%
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCVILLE CENTRE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • NH
    NAZARETH HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Health and Welfare Council of Long Island Inc

Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them

Health
4
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
5
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
8
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
9
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
10
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
11
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
12
Meals for Good Inc

To reduce food insecurity for all people living in New York City by increasing access and choice to culturally relevant healthy food. We envision a time when everyone in NYC will have equitable access to a variety of healthy, fresh food.…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank for New York City; the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Hope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $325,000 · OtherBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $325,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDROSEARY HILL HOME: $200,000 · OtherROSEARY HILL HOMEST PIUS X: $122,315 · OtherST PIUS XCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE: $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTREST PIUS X CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCHTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Other+6 more: $16,700 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION: $325,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthNORTHWELL H…DIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalNAZARETH HOUSING INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 · Community ImprovementLong Island Cares Inc: $100 · Human Services
Other$1,174,015Philanthropy$325,000Health$180,000International$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,500Community Improvement$5,000Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Phelan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Phelan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Phelan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Phelan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Phelan’s filings →

More from the funding graph