Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Phelan Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$975kReligion$271kHousing & Shelter$207kHealth$180kEducation$45kFood & Nutrition$11kInternational$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $122k
  • $250k+3 grants · $975k
$325,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$325,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$325,000
BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$325,000
ST PIUS X$122,315
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$520k · 5 repeat orgs$861k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$520k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+38%

Still filing today

20%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $772k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROSEARY HILL HOME
    2× · 2018–2019 · $200k
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $180k · revenue +17%
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k

Funded once

  • TH
    TOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -99%
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCVILLE CENTRE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • NH
    NAZARETH HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

3
Health and Welfare Council of Long Island Inc

Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them

Health
4
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
5
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

8
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

9
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
10
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
11
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
12
Meals for Good Inc

To reduce food insecurity for all people living in New York City by increasing access and choice to culturally relevant healthy food. We envision a time when everyone in NYC will have equitable access to a variety of healthy, fresh food.…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank for New York City and the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Hope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $325,000 · OtherBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $325,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDROSEARY HILL HOME — $200,000 · OtherROSEARY HILL HOMEST PIUS X — $122,315 · OtherST PIUS XCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE — $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTREST PIUS X CHURCH — $65,000 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCHTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Other+6 more — $16,700 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $325,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $180,000 · HealthNORTHWELL H…DIRECT RELIEF — $5,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $5,000 · InternationalNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $5,000 · Community ImprovementLong Island Cares Inc — $100 · Human Services
Other$1,174,015Philanthropy$325,000Health$180,000International$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,500Community Improvement$5,000Human Services$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $325,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NAZARETH HOUSING INC
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Phelan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Phelan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Phelan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph