Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Percy Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$973kPublic Benefit$774kCivil Rights$711kHealth$499kInternational$303kEducation$276kHuman Services$268kCrime & Legal$245kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $295k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$80,000
FRIENDS OF YEMIN ORDE INC$60,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$55,000
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE$50,000
ACCURACY IN MEDIA$50,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$40,000
DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER$40,000
FIRE$35,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$30,000
PACIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY$30,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$25,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$20,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK$20,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$20,000
NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $65k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $60k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $60k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $43k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $6k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 24 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$4.2M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+44%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitCrime & LegalInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $625k · revenue +7%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +141%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $353k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH-MID-ATLANTIC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue ×12
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
3
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
National Civil Justice Institute

The objectives and goals of the institute shall be to receive and administer funds for the purpose of providing and supporting educational programs for lawyers, legal academics, and members of the judiciary, conferences and publications…

—
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Clarion Sunshine Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $625,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTERACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $347,500 · Arts & CultureACCURACY IN MEDIA INCDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $252,500 · OtherDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTERFIRE: $220,500 · OtherFIREALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK: $109,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN NEW YORKYoung America's Foundation: $103,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $85,000 · OtherTHE YEMIN ORDE ECOLOGICAL CENTER: $80,000 · OtherPacific Research Institute For Public Policy: $257,000 · OtherPacific Research Institute For Public PolicyALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $169,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSO…THE CLARION SUNSHINE PROJECT: $86,000 · OtherPacific Legal Foundation: $194,000 · OtherPacific Legal Foundation+10 more: $186,500 · Other+10 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $485,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WAT…+1 more: $2,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $352,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …IMPACTISRAEL INC: $300,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $139,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · Education+4 more: $16,700 · EducationFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $266,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$972,500Other$1,742,500Public Benefit$487,000Civil Rights$352,500International$302,000Education$275,700Human Services$266,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $625,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $485,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $352,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $347,500 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $300,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $266,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPacific Research Institute For Public Policy: $257,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $252,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $194,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $169,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $139,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $103,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLARION SUNSHINE PROJECT: $86,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $51,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL BUCKS CO: $35,000 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS FOR BOOTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Research Institute For Public Policy ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CLARION SUNSHINE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL BUCKS CO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TIMOTHY SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS FOR BOOTS ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Percy Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Percy Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Percy Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Percy Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Percy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph