Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Penn Schoellkopf Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$89kAnimals$48kEducation$41kHuman Services$38kEnvironment$21kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$423k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jacobs Institute$15,000
Buffalo Therapeutic Riding Center$5,000
Stephen Comunale Cancer Foundation$3,000
Feedmore WNY$3,000
Danny & Ron's Rescue - Save the Strays$3,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Genesee Valley Conservancy$2,000
Planned Parenthood$2,000
SPCA$2,000
St Francis Roman Catholic Church in Tonawanda$2,000
King Urban Life Center$1,000
Elmwood Franklin School$1,000
Nichols School$1,000
Ronald McDonald House$1,000
Westminster Economic Development Initiative$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CDF Firefighters Benevolent Foundation: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
NC
SC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$268k · 23 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$268k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+17%

Still filing today

52%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +20%
  • BT
    BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +37%
  • NS
    NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MS
    Madiera School
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • FO
    Friends of Knox Farm
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Buffalo Niagara River Land Trust Inc

To acquire, remediate, and steward lands along wny's waterfronts prioritizing public access.

Environment
2
Zoological Society of Buffalo Inc

Building community; creating connections; saving wildlife through a collaboration for change: the buffalo zoo will be a center of conservation excellence, providing leadership to secure a future where wildlife thrives. we embody our…

Animals
3
South Buffalo Charter School

South buffalo charter school provides elementary education to students in grades kindergarten through eighth grade. we are a professional learning community. our focus on learning is driven by research, data and collaborative reflection to…

Education
4
Buffalo Collegiate Charter School

With unrelenting determination and a commitment to excellence, buffalo collegiate charter school educated students in grades 4 through 12 to graduate from the college of their choice and serve as our next generation of leaders. the…

5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Buffalo Commons Charter School

Establish and operate a charter school to prepare our diverse community of students to succeed academically and professionally regardless of background and circumstance.

Education
7
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
8
Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences

Inspire joyful exploration of science and nature through engaging experiences, unique resources, and exceptional staff.

Arts & Culture
9
The Park School of Buffalo

The school engages the student in a diverse and creative community that nurtures the joy and responsibility of active learning in all, from our youngest learners to our graduates, who leave with the skills essential to college success and…

Education
10
Enterprise Charter School

Engage young minds through projects and partnerships.

Education
11
Brick Buffalo Academy Charter School

At brick buffalo academy charter school ("bracs"), we will graduate a community of learners who will contribute positively to our global society and embrace their role as architects in building a just and better world. we use a holistic…

Education
12
Buffalo Erie Niagara Land Improvement Corporation

The buffalo erie niagara land improvement corporation (benlic) seeks to confront and alleviate the problems distressed properties cause to communities by supporting municipal and regional revitalization efforts and strategically acquiring,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buffalo Prep Inc and the most unlike its peers is Danny & Rons Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $21,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYStephen Comunale Cancer Foundation — $19,000 · OtherStephen Comunale Cancer FoundationSPCA — $15,000 · OtherSPCASPCA of Erie County — $12,000 · OtherSPCA of Erie CountyRonald McDonald House — $11,000 · OtherRonald McDonald HouseFeedmore WNY — $7,000 · OtherFeedmore WNYRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Ctr — $7,000 · OtherRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CtrDRAVES ARBORETUM — $6,000 · OtherBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $8,000 · OtherBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY+12 more — $21,250 · Other+12 moreTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC — $37,500 · HealthTHE JACOBS INST…NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $20,000 · EducationNICHOLS SCHOOL …ELMWOOD-FRANKLIN SCHOOL INC — $12,000 · EducationELMWOOD-FRANKLI…BUFFALO SEMINARY — $5,500 · EducationBUFFALO SEMINAR…BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $21,000 · Recreation & SportsBUFFALO THE…CRADLE BEACH INC — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsCRADLE BEAC…DANNY & RONS RESCUE — $16,000 · AnimalsOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,000 · AnimalsWESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementKING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC — $6,000 · Community ImprovementGenesee Valley Conservancy Inc — $15,000 · Environment
Other$127,250Health$37,500Education$37,500Recreation & Sports$28,000Animals$18,000Community Improvement$16,000Environment$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $21,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $16,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGenesee Valley Conservancy Inc — $15,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetELMWOOD-FRANKLIN SCHOOL INC — $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLE BEACH INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBUFFALO SEMINARY — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FIRE BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBUFFALO PREP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
  • Who funds NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE
  • Who funds Genesee Valley Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds ELMWOOD-FRANKLIN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY
  • Who funds CRADLE BEACH INC
  • Who funds KING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO SEMINARY
  • Who funds OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds CAL FIRE BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BUFFALO PREP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · Children's Foundation of Erie County Inc · The Osc Charitable Foundation · The Frank G Raichle Foundation · The Baird Foundation · Edwin M Johnston Jr Family Foundation · Buffalo Bills Foundation Inc · The Western New York Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Helen Dent Lenahan Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Penn Schoellkopf Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph