Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Paul Scammell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$168kEducation$127kInternational$82kHealth$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kFood & Nutrition$18k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS AUDIO MISSION$15,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$10,000
MERCY CORPS$6,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC: $5k → 12%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $43k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $15k → 10%INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $1k → 11%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED: $10k → 14%MERCY CORPS: $2k → 12%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $10k → 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC: $5k → 12%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $20k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $15k → 10%FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $10k → 17%MERCY CORPS: $1k → 12%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $5k → 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC: $3k → 12%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $20k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $15k → 10%FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $10k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $5k → 9%AWESOME THEATRE: $20k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $10k → 10%FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $2k → 17%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $15k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $10k → 10%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%AWESOME THEATRE: $15k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $10k → 10%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $10k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $10k → 10%AWESOME THEATRE: $10k → 10%WOMENS AUDIO MISSION: $5k → 10%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $9k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $6k → 10%AWESOME THEATRE: $2k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%MURAL: $5k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $500 → 10%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CLARION PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OR
IA
CT
CA
MD
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$421k · 12 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$421k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+34%

Still filing today

92%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationArts & CultureEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Womens Audio Mission
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +167%
  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    6× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +21%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CP
    CLARION PERFORMING ARTS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +219%
  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MC
    Mural Companygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
5
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
6
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

7
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
10
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clarion Performing Arts Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Techbridge Girls — $127,200 · EducationTechbridge GirlsMural Company — $5,000 · EducationMercy Corps — $25,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsSave The Children Federation Inc — $20,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federat…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $12,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Comm…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES …NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $8,500 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalWomens Audio Mission — $90,000 · EmploymentWomens Audio MissionAWESOME THEATRE — $46,000 · OtherAWESOME THEATRESAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $17,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT — $5,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRO…FRACTURED ATLAS INC — $22,000 · Arts & CultureCLARION PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $5,450 · Arts & CultureBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $22,000 · Health
Education$132,200International$97,000Employment$90,000Other$68,500Arts & Culture$27,450Health$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTechbridge Girls — $127,200 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetWomens Audio Mission — $90,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMercy Corps — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCLARION PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $5,450 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMural Company — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Paul Scammell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph