Skip to content

· Public charity

The Paul Robert Carey Foundation

Enabling people battling cancer and other diseases to obtain vital quality of life needs and services not funded by traditional medical reimbursements.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$604k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $70,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,145 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,845 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$20,000
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
OUR LADY OF THE ISLE$10,000
KIDS NEED MORE CAMP ADVENTURE$10,000
ISLAND GIFT OF LIFE$10,000
FIGHTING CHANCE - SHELTER ISLAND$5,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIDS NEED MORE - CAMP ADVENTURE: $20k → 7%NYC HEALTH HOSPITALS AT ELMHURST: $15k → 13%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $25k → 17%MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%KIDS NEED MORE: $15k → 7%NYC HEALTH HOSPITALS AT ELMHURST: $5k → 13%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $20k → 17%KIDS NEED MORE: $10k → 7%NYC HEALTH HOSPITALS AT ELMHURST: $5k → 13%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $20k → 17%KIDS NEED MORE: $10k → 7%NYC HEALTH HOSPITALS AT ELMHURST: $5k → 13%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $20k → 17%KIDS NEED MORE: $10k → 7%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $15k → 17%KIDS NEED MORE CAMP ADVENTURE: $10k → 7%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $15k → 17%KIDS NEED MORE: $5k → 7%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $15k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $30k → 7%ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $15k → 7%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $20k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $15k → 7%BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $15k → 7%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $12k → 7%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE - SHELTER ISLAND: $5k → 7%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $5k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $20k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $10k → 7%MT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS: $8k → 17%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $10k → 7%ISLAND GIFT OF LIFE: $10k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $8k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $8k → 7%OUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$594k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$594k
$10k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +121%
  • MR
    MOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +68%
  • TM
    THE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • IG
    ISLAND GIFT OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $150,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERFIGHTING CHANCE INC: $96,800 · HealthFIGHTING CHANCE INCMOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INC: $80,000 · HealthMOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INCTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $47,500 · HealthTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INCBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $22,500 · HealthBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTERALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM: $87,500 · OtherALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEMOUR LADY OF THE ISLE: $66,100 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ISLENEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION: $30,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS COR…ISLAND GIFT OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS: $10,000 · OtherADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$396,800Other$203,600Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHTING CHANCE INC: $96,800 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetMOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INC: $80,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $47,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIGHTING CHANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Paul Robert Carey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Paul Robert Carey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul Robert Carey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph