Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Paul L Newman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$338kHousing & Shelter$157kAnimals$75kReligion$48kHuman Services$44kHealth$27kArts & Culture$16kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$520
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS$51,704
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI$16,973
KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY$10,673
PROJECT HOME$4,000
LOWER MERION SYNAGOGUE$3,650
BALA CYNWYD LIBRARY$2,925
JEWISH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVC$1,800
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA$750
HILLEL-UNIV OF CINCINNATI$520
JEWISH CEMETERIES OF CINCINNATI$500
UNION FIRE ASSOCIATION$480
Individual grant recipient$447
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION$360
AMERICAN RED CROSS$360
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT HOME: $61k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $23k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $35k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $17k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $22k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $12k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $12k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $7k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $11k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $6k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $11k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $5k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $4k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $2k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $2k → 6%BIKKUR CHOLIM OF PHILADELPHIA: $420 → 22%DELAWARE VALLEY FAIRNESS PROJECT: $250 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$709k · 31 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
30

Total granted

$709k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+16%

Still filing today

32%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +67%
  • IG
    ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +36%
  • KO
    KEREN OR INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • JM
    JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +25%
  • AH
    ABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
2
Abraham Joshua Heschel School

The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Judaism Foundation
6
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Sherit Isroel
11
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bikkur Cholim of Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionJewish Community FederationsPublic Library SupportHospice Care ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr15%34%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%3%20–35yr15%82%35–55yr17%11%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,128

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS — $272,245 · OtherPEF ENDOWMENT FUNDSJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA — $62,353 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILAJEWISH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVC — $41,340 · OtherJEWISH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SVCLOWER MERION SYNAGOGUE — $17,578 · Other+44 more — $62,437 · Other+44 morePROJECT HOME — $157,409 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $74,668 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI…+3 more — $1,170 · Human ServicesKEREN OR INC — $23,449 · EducationIS KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — $10,673 · EducationGRATZ COLLEGE — $3,430 · Education+2 more — $970 · EducationThe Chevra Inc — $5,180 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe Army Historical Foundation Inc — $256 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $250 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI ELIYAHU — $850 · PhilanthropyThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,590 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $500 · InternationalABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY — $1,250 · Religion
Other$455,953Human Services$233,247Education$38,522Arts & Culture$6,686Philanthropy$2,850International$2,090Religion$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT HOME — $157,409 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $74,668 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetKEREN OR INC — $23,449 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetIS KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — $10,673 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Chevra Inc — $5,180 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGRATZ COLLEGE — $3,430 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,590 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $1,530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI ELIYAHU — $850 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMORRIS AND ROSE CASKEY TORAH ACADEMY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBikkur Cholim of Philadelphia — $420 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Links Incorporated South Jersey Chapter — $360 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Army Historical Foundation Inc — $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDelaware Valley Fairness Project — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELMONT HILLS FIRE COMPANY — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT HOME
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC
  • Who funds IS KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
  • Who funds The Chevra Inc
  • Who funds GRATZ COLLEGE
  • Who funds JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED
  • Who funds CHASDEI ELIYAHU
  • Who funds MORRIS AND ROSE CASKEY TORAH ACADEMY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Erlbaum Family FoundationPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Erlbaum Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Foundation for Jewish Day Schools of Greater Philadelphia · The Edwin J and Barbara R Berkowitz Family Foundation · Katz Family Charitable Trust · Tzedakah Foundation · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Paul L Newman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph