Skip to content
The Paul & Amy Hach Charitable Foundation INC at a glance

· Private foundation

The Paul & Amy Hach Charitable Foundation INC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$823kAnimals$10kPhilanthropy$9kFood & Nutrition$6kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE$50,000
DEBUT THEATER COMPANY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%U S AUDI CLUB: $5k → 7%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $65k → 9%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $50k → 9%FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC LOVELAND: $4k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $45k → 9%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $90k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $45k → 9%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $54k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $45k → 9%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $40k → 9%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $40k → 9%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $22k → 11%COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $15k → 9%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $20k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $20k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $20k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $20k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $20k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $15k → 11%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $10k → 11%DEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $10k → 11%PUBLIC RADIO FOR THE FRONT RANGE: $10k → 11%NEAERA ROBOTICS INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$814k · 4 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$814k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+138%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO
    7× · 2017–2023 · $345k · revenue +55%
  • PR
    Public Radio for the Front Range
    6× · 2018–2025 · $259k · revenue +56%
  • DT
    DEBUT THEATER COMPANY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NH
    Noco Humanegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +138%
  • GT
    Going To The Sun Rallygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +64%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS FOR FORT COLLINS COLORADO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Community Radio

The Mission of Rocky Mountain Community Radio is to develop, promote andsupport the role of community radio stations through communication with andcollaboration of member stations. We support our member stations by:- Producing and…

Arts & Culture
2
Fraser Valley Community Media Inc

Fraser Valley Community Media operates community radio stations KFFR 88.3 FM and KWTR 89.1 FM to unite Grand County, Colorado, by broadcasting local music, news, cultural programming, youth education, and civic information.

Arts & Culture
3
Magic Circle Players

To entertain educate and involve the residents of western colorado by the presentation of live theater

—
4
Southern Colorado Theatre Company

At Steel City Theatre Company we transform lives one act at a time. Through unique, fun, challenging, entretaining, and professional theatrical productions and training, we recognize how the focus and discipline of performing arts sets…

Arts & Culture
5
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
6
Backstage Theatre Inc

The Backstage Theatre provides the residents and visitors to Summit County Colorado the opportunity to experience and participate in quality live theatre.

Arts & Culture
7
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
8
Rocky Mountain Dance Theatre

Each year the rocky mountain dance theatre stages the nutcracker and other dance programs ballet during the holiday season. the ballet brings dance culture to cody and surrounding county residents.

Arts & Culture
9
Fort Collins Symphony Association

Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.

—
10
Colorado New Play Festival

The Colorado New Play Festival partners with theatre companies throughout the country to provide a unique opportunity for artists to create new work for the American stage.

Arts & Culture
11
Rocky Mountain Corporation for Public Broadcasting
—
12
Theatre Aspen

Entertain, enlighten, enrich, educate and challenge the residents and visitors of the roaring fork valley through professional quality theatrical productions, new play development initiatives and a broad spectrum of educational programs.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Radio for Northern Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Debut Theater Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $345,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADOPublic Radio for the Front Range: $259,300 · Arts & CulturePublic Radio for the Front RangeDEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $127,000 · Arts & CultureDEBUT THEATER COMPANYOpenStage Theatre and Co Inc: $83,000 · Arts & CultureOpenStage Theatre and Co IncNoco Humane: $10,000 · AnimalsU S AUDI CLUB: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC LOVELAND: $4,000 · OtherGoing To The Sun Rally: $8,950 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS FOR FORT COLLINS COLORADO INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionNEAERA ROBOTICS INC: $5,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$814,300Animals$10,000Other$9,000Philanthropy$8,950Food & Nutrition$6,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $345,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPublic Radio for the Front Range: $259,300 over 6y, 24% of budgetDEBUT THEATER COMPANY: $127,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetOpenStage Theatre and Co Inc: $83,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetNoco Humane: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS FOR FORT COLLINS COLORADO INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otter Cares Foundatio…Colorado Gives Founda…Community Foundation …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATIONCO17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Paul & Amy Hach Charitable Foundation INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Paul & Amy Hach Charitable Foundation INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul & Amy Hach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home