Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Patuxent Partnership Inc

The patuxent partnership is dedicated to the development of the technology community in southern maryland by partnering government, academia, and the private sector.

$561k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$196k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Employment$1.8MEducation$114k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $298k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (S$196,254
ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUN$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$32,000
ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND$32,000
LETOURNEAU UNIVERSITY$23,353
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$21,000
CSM FOUNDATION$17,500
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$15,000
DENISON UNIVERSITY$15,000
VIRGINIA TECH OFFICE OF THE UNIVERS$15,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER$15,000
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$15,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$15,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AIRTALENT CAP$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%LETOURNEAU UNIVERSITY: $23k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AIRTALENT CAP: $15k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF DCEFFECTS OF DEFEC: $15k → 14%FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 10%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSIT: $15k → 12%DENISON UNIVERSITYTRANSITION METAL: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $15k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH OFFICE OF THE UNIVERS: $15k → 21%CSM FOUNDATION: $248k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $32k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $21k → 19%LETORNEAU UNIVERSITYMODELING OF RO: $15k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 10%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE: $15k → 19%VTMODELING OF TURBULENT FLOW FOR I: $15k → 21%CSM FOUNDATION: $99k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15k → 11%JHUCH-47 AIR TRANSPORTATION ASSESS: $15k → 19%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER: $15k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 21%CSM FOUNDATION: $18k → 8%VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 21%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MD FOUNDATION: $11k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $65k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & ST: $13k → 21%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUN: $60k → 8%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ST MARYS COLLEGE OF MD FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%ST MARYS COLLEGE OF MD FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%ST MARYS COLLEGE OF MD FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%ST MARYS COLLEGE OF MD FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%ST MARYS COLLEGE OF MD FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND: $32k → 8%ST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (S: $196k → 8%ST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (S: $160k → 8%ST MARY'S RYKEN HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 8%ST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $27k → 8%ST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 8%STEM FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%STEM FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%STEM FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%LEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 14 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$1.8M
$70k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $455k · revenue +85%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $405k · revenue +37%
  • LS
    LEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARYS RYKEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • GO
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

2
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
3
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
4
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
University of Maryland Emergency Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's College of Maryland Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Marys County Public Schools Science Technology Engineering & M. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $455,000 · EducationST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $405,135 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCLEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND INC — $78,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND INCST MARYS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING & M — $60,000 · EducationLeTourneau University — $38,353 · Education+4 more — $111,000 · Education+4 moreST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (S — $419,750 · OtherST MARY'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (SUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $86,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVE…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $45,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF I…ST MARYS RYKEN INC — $40,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · Other+4 more — $60,000 · Other+4 moreGROWINGSTEMS INC — $18,000 · Health
Education$1,147,488Other$761,250Health$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $455,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $405,135 over 7y, 19% of budgetLEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND INC — $78,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetLeTourneau University — $38,353 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROWINGSTEMS INC — $18,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP SOUTHERN MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds ST MARYS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING & M
  • Who funds LeTourneau University
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds GROWINGSTEMS INC
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Patuxent Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Johns Hopkins University11% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc3% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph