Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Patrick G Bromley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$395kFood & Nutrition$394kHousing & Shelter$165kHuman Services$140kEnvironment$131kArts & Culture$110k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON$50,000
WEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC$25,000
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE$25,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK INC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$25,000
WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON$25,000
TEXAS MAP SOCIETY$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TARGET HUNGER: $15k → 16%TARGET HUNGER: $10k → 16%TARGET HUNGER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

62%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Houston Food Bank
    5× · 2020–2024 · $304k · revenue +36%
  • THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +26%
  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Harvest Inc

Urban Harvest is transforming food accessibility in Greater Houston through partnerships with local farmers and gardeners, vibrant Farmers Markets and mobile markets, and comprehensive garden education. Our goal is not just to improve, but…

Environment
2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

3
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

4
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
5
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
6
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

7
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
8
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

9
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
10
University of Houston Foundation

University of Houston Foundation provides program support to University of Houston System for various scholarship and educational programs.

Education
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
Houston Academy of Medicine

The mission of the Houston Academy of Medicine is to support the community service, education, scientific, and charitable programs for physicians, their patients, and the community at large in Harris County.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank — $304,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $140,000 · OtherWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INCTEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE — $130,600 · OtherTEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICEUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON - UTA SCHOLARSHIP — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON - UTA SCHOLARSHIPTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $95,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCMuseum of Printing History dba The Printing Museum — $75,000 · OtherMuseum of Printing History dba The Printing MuseumUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON+2 more — $39,500 · OtherSouthern Methodist University — $100,000 · EducationSouthern Metho…William Marsh Rice University — $75,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh …THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON — $165,000 · HealthTHE BEACON OF …Target Hunger Inc — $35,000 · Human ServicesCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$934,100Education$175,000Health$165,000Human Services$35,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $304,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON — $165,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Printing History dba The Printing Museum — $75,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetTarget Hunger Inc — $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHeights Interfaith Ministries Inc — $29,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON
  • Who funds WEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University
  • Who funds Museum of Printing History dba The Printing Museum
  • Who funds Target Hunger Inc
  • Who funds Heights Interfaith Ministries Inc
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable FoundationTX13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Patrick G Bromley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph