Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Palmer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$3.1MHealth$2.0MReligion$350kScience & Tech$205kHousing & Shelter$150kPhilanthropy$150kArts & Culture$120kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$75,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$750,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
WSU ADVANCE FUND$125,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
DISCOVERY SPACE$30,000
WEST MORRIS AREA YMCA$30,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $75k → 8%HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $75k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 6 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$6.0M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-12%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $205k · revenue +62%
  • HF
    HOUSING FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $150k · revenue +444%
  • MR
    Molalla River Academy
    3× · 2019–2021 · $113k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • UB
    UNIVERSITY BAPIST BRETHREN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • CC
    CENTRE COUNTY COMMUNICATION FDN
    one grant, 2019 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
2
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts

To create a space in our communities through education and cultural experiences that celebrate the joy of discovery and entertainment.

Arts & Culture
3
Lake Erie Nature and Science Center

Lake erie nature & science center educates and inspires each of us to understand, appreciate, and take responsibility for our natural world. serving more than 100,000 people each year with animal exhibits and programs, planetarium shows,…

Arts & Culture
4
Riverbend Environmental Education Center

Riverbend's purpose is to foster an awareness, appreciation, and understanding of our total environment through educational programming. by growing both the love of nature and environmental literacy, we aim to inspire action that…

Environment
5
Discovery Center of Springfield Inc

A science center based museum providing hands-on educational experiences to all people through interactive exhibits, school presentations and video conferencing nationwide, youth and adults learn more about living through science facts.

Arts & Culture
6
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
7
The Da Vinci Discovery Center of Science and Technology Inc

Our mission is to bring science to life and lives to science. through inquiry-based science learning experiences, we champion the next generation and help build a technical and scientific workforce. see schedule o.

Arts & Culture
8
Philadelphia Area Center for History of Science

Promoting scholarly and public understanding of history of science, technology and medicine.

Education
9
Central Conservation Inc

To empower a constellation of environmental organizations working to care for our earth.

Environment
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
12
Rochester Museum & Science Center

The mission of the rochester museum and science center is to create a better world through inspiring curiosity, exploration, and engagement across history, science, culture, and the natural world.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Morris Area Ymca and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,000,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $1,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENNSYLVANIS STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIS STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY BAPIST BRETHREN CHURCH — $250,000 · Other+7 more — $480,000 · Other+7 moreCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $2,000,000 · HealthCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINEDISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC — $205,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $20,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSING FAMILIES INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesMolalla River Academy — $113,461 · EducationWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,230,000Health$2,000,000Arts & Culture$225,000Human Services$150,000Education$113,461Environment$15,000Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $2,000,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetDISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC — $205,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetHOUSING FAMILIES INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMolalla River Academy — $113,461 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetWest Morris Area YMCA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
  • Who funds DISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC
  • Who funds HOUSING FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Molalla River Academy
  • Who funds West Morris Area YMCA
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Palmer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Housing Families Inc12% of income from government
  • Molalla River Academy2% of income from government
  • West Morris Area Ymca0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Palmer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Palmer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph