How much did THE P RICHARD & CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THE P RICHARD & CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

greater

2021

—

2022

—

2023

greaterjewish

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$151,350

Median grant

States reached

$482k

Total assets

Largest grants

RICHARD AND CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN DAF$151,350

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Federation of Greater

—

Jewish Federation of Greater

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of Greater

Ensure that the jewish community of greater harrisburg flourishes by serving as its central unifying communal organization, and by strengthening the bonds within our community and with israel and jews around the world.

Human Services

Jewish Federation of Eastern

The federation collects contributions from the public and distributes them to various agencies, individuals and other non-profit organizations to benefit the jewish and local community. the federation provides direct services to seniors,…

—

The Jewish Federation of Greater New

To coordinate planning, programming and fundraising for the jewish community of greater new haven ,connecticut

—

Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle

The federation leads a strong jewish puget sound by serving as a community voice, (see schedule o) strengthening connections to israel and world jewry, and making investments in jewish life, for today and the next generation.

Philanthropy

The Contemporary Jewish Museum

Makes the diversity of jewish experience relevant through art & programs that challenge & inspire.

Arts & Culture

Greensboro Jewish Federation

The greensboro jewish federation builds community among the jewish people of greensboro, assuring continuity from generation to generation. recognizing that each jew is responsible, one for another, the federation promotes the welfare of…

Philanthropy

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest Nj

Jewish community foundation (jcf) ensures the future of the jewish federation of greater metrowest nj through effective endowment management, personalized planned giving strategies and grant-making.

Philanthropy

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc

The Jewish Community Foundation promotes philanthropy, manages the Greater Hartford Jewish community's charitable endowment and makes grants to support key community needs and innovations.

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City

To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of Central New

To serve the interest and well being of jews in central new york and worldwide.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish and the most unlike its peers is Toca Juniors Football Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

4/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$427,598Arts & Culture$60,500Religion$50,000Philanthropy$45,800Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$1,800Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jewish Federation of GreaterMD18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jewish Federation of Greater · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE P RICHARD & CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TOCA JUNIORS FOOTBALL CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 208232326 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TOCA JUNIORS FOOTBALL CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The P Richard & Cindy Kramer Zitelman?

Find your warmest path to The P Richard & Cindy Kramer Zitelman through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE P RICHARD & CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The P Richard & Cindy Kramer Zitelman?

More from the funding graph

THE P RICHARD & CINDY KRAMER ZITELMAN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The P Richard & Cindy Kramer Zitelman?

More from the funding graph