Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Owens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$13MHealth$2.6MScience & Tech$2.3MYouth Development$875kAnimals$400kArts & Culture$175kEnvironment$100kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $539k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$1,574,500
MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB$164,000
WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH$125,000
NVNA & HOSPICE$100,000
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION$100,000
SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$50,000
BUZZARDS BAY COALITION$25,000
HISTORIC NEW ENGLAND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $125k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $389k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $168k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.6M → 8%SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $292k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $168k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.6M → 8%SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $282k → 8%UNIVERITY OF VIRGINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $256k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.5M → 8%NORWELL VNA AND HOSPICE: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $255k → 8%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $243k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.4M → 8%NVNA & HOSPICE: $100k → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $231k → 8%MARINE BIOLOICAL LABORATORY: $231k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.4M → 8%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $164k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 16%MASS AUDUBON SACRED HEARTS: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.4M → 8%MASS AUDUBON SACRED HEARTS: $100k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 16%MASS AUDUBON SACRED HEARTS: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.4M → 8%MASS AUDUBON SACRED HEARTS: $100k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.2M → 8%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $125k → 16%COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1.1M → 8%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Owens Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 28%.

The Owens Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 11 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$18M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+216%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyScience & TechArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $875k · revenue +23%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $785k · revenue +99%
  • NV
    Norwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $700k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • THE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.1M · revenue +216%
  • MB
    MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $231k · revenue +37%
  • UO
    UNIVERITY OF VIRGINA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is President and Fellows of Harvard College; the most unlike its peers is Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $11,343,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAMARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $2,112,200 · OtherMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc: $700,000 · Other+5 more: $1,060,000 · Other+5 moreTHE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1,100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COLLEGE…WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $874,875 · PhilanthropyWELLINGTON …BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $785,000 · HealthWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $425,000 · HealthFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $231,000 · Science & TechSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL: $175,000 · Arts & CulturePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $125,000 · EducationBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $100,000 · Environment
Other$15,215,900Philanthropy$1,974,875Health$1,360,000Science & Tech$231,000Arts & Culture$175,000Education$125,000Environment$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $1,100,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION: $874,875 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $785,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc: $700,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $425,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $231,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL: $175,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $100,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Norwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Owens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Owens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory: 20% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of New Engl: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Owens Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Owens Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Owens Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph