Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Orphiflamme Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.7MArts & Culture$1.2MEducation$459kEnvironment$190kCivil Rights$150kInternational$120kPhilanthropy$88kFood & Nutrition$78kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $282k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Iyyun Center$82,000
Virginia Organizing$80,000
Ayin Press Limited$70,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Chabad of Charlottesville$40,000
PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc$40,000
Sukkat Shaleym Inc$30,000
Friends of Lev Le'Daas Inc$25,000
The Torah and Nature Foundation$25,000
Chabad East DC Jewish Center$18,000
Chasdei Yisroel$18,000
Healing Harvest Forest Foundation$15,000
Living Earth School$15,000
Yiddish Farm Education Center$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROCKFISH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 13%VINE & FIG TREE: $10k → 11%Rockfish Valley Community Center (RFISHVAL): $8k → 13%American Friends of Bat Ayin Yeshiva: $15k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAT AYIN YESHIVA: $10k → 17%COVESVILLE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 32 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
67

Total granted

$2.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $317k · revenue +57%
  • TA
    THE AYIN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $220k · revenue +224%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    4× · 2018–2022 · $145k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • LE
    Living Earth School (LEASCHOO)
    one grant, 2022 · $180k
  • A
    Arthive
    one grant, 2021 · $95k
  • SI
    SEFARIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
The Yesod Avoda Foundation
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Canfei Nesharim

To provide education relating to the connection between jewish traditional teachings and the importance of protecting the environment. to provide educational programs for synagogues and jewish schools.

—
5
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Yakar Foundation Inc
—
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
9
Tzohar Arts

Tzohar provides an environment where talented young women engage in profound Jewish learning and are empowered to express their thoughts and feelings through various artistic forms. By the end of the school year, students have discovered a…

Education
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
Ofeq Institute Inc

Discover and restore Jewish literary works

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covesville Child Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/38
Grantees still filing
19/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IYYUN CENTER: $364,300 · OtherIYYUN CENTERLiving Earth School (LEASCHOO): $180,000 · OtherLiving Earth School (LEASCHOO)CHABAD OF CHARLOTTESVILLE: $135,000 · OtherBILVAVI MISHKAN EVNEH INC: $125,000 · OtherJEWISH CREATIVITY INTERNATIONAL: $112,000 · OtherLUBAVITCH ON THE PALISADES: $100,000 · OtherArthive: $95,000 · OtherBILVAVI MISHKAN EVNEH IN: $87,500 · Other+70 more: $1,386,366 · Other+70 moreFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $317,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS…THE AYIN INSTITUTE INC: $220,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AYIN INSTIT…CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $7,000 · Arts & CultureThe Trustees of Princeton University: $145,000 · EducationThe Trust…SUKKAT SHALEYM INC: $97,000 · EducationSUKKAT SH…SEFARIA INC: $75,000 · EducationSEFARIA I…Yiddish Farm Educational Center Inc: $15,000 · Education+3 more: $18,500 · EducationORCHOS CHAIM CHABURA: $66,000 · ReligionTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · ReligionTHE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC: $32,000 · ReligionJCUC BLESSING INC: $25,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAF YOMI ADVANCEMENT FORUM INC: $20,000 · ReligionJewish Sunshine Circle: $19,000 · ReligionTHE JEWISH STUDIO PROJECT: $18,000 · ReligionYesod Foundation: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $3,000 · ReligionVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $140,000 · Community ImprovementNew Community Project: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $73,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropySHIVITI INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyLIVING EARTH SCHOOL: $65,000 · EnvironmentUNITED PLANT SAVERS: $15,000 · Environment
Other$2,585,166Arts & Culture$569,000Education$350,500Religion$248,000Community Improvement$155,000Philanthropy$144,000Environment$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $317,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AYIN INSTITUTE INC: $220,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $145,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUKKAT SHALEYM INC: $97,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $78,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $73,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetORCHOS CHAIM CHABURA: $66,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING EARTH SCHOOL: $65,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetYAD YAAKOV: $35,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetTHE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC: $32,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCANOPY CANOPY CANOPY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Bat Ayin Yeshiva: $25,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetJCUC BLESSING INC: $25,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAF YOMI ADVANCEMENT FORUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE JEWISH STUDIO PROJECT: $18,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMPOWER NOW INC: $18,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetOPEN HANDS: $18,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLAMPLIGHTERS YESHIVAH: $17,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetROCKFISH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $16,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNew Community Project: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED PLANT SAVERS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHAZON INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FIGURING: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHIVITI INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOVESVILLE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSHLAVIM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetVSDB FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSlow Money Institute Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AYIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds SUKKAT SHALEYM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SEFARIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCHOS CHAIM CHABURA ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING EARTH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YAD YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds THE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Bat Ayin Yeshiva ↗
  • Who funds JCUC BLESSING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Opaline FundCA47.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Opaline Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Polis Schutz Family Foundation · Fjc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Community Foundation Boulder County · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Orphiflamme Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Orphiflamme Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Orphiflamme Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Orphiflamme Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Orphiflamme’s filings →

More from the funding graph