· Private foundation
The Orchard House Foundation -A Nevada Non Profit Corporation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of The Orchard House Foundation -A Nevada Non Profit Corporation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k27 grants · $565k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Women Donors Network | $100,000 |
| MADRE | $40,000 |
| COW Bus Community Chest | $30,000 |
| Native American Community Board | $20,000 |
| Shared Interest Society Ltd | $20,000 |
| American Youth Understanding Diabetes | $20,000 |
| High Country News Foundation | $20,000 |
| Reno Food Systems | $20,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $20,000 |
| Diabetic Youth Foundation | $20,000 |
| Puente | $20,000 |
| Asian Immigrnts Womns Advocates | $20,000 |
| National Domestic Workers Alliance | $20,000 |
| Feed The Hunger Foundation | $20,000 |
| Action Aid | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WDWOMEN DONORS NETWORK9× · 2017–2025 · $750k · revenue +276%
WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +4%- JFJUST FOREIGN POLICY7× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +220%
Funded once
- NMNevada Museum of Artone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -3%
- TFTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +201%
- NFNILE Foundationone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
To facilitate collaboration, innovation, strategic growth and cultural impact for the media arts field. We are a network of networks; we embolden creative media organization and artists and connect them with the world.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…
Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shared Interest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sew Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds JUST FOREIGN POLICY ↗
- Who funds MADRE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rivers Network ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT BASIN OUTDOOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FEED THE HUNGER FUND ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds Enriching Lives Through Music ↗
- Who funds THE MOSAIC PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds DYF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SOMOS MAYFAIR INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH UNDERSTANDING DIABETES ABROAD INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL DEVELOPMENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The California Endowment · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Orchard House Foundation -A Nevada Non Profit Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.