Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Oram Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Community Improvement$85kEnvironment$40kCivil Rights$15kPhilanthropy$6kPublic Benefit$3kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$6,437
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Regional Plan Association$65,000
Virginia Organizing$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TriState Transportation Campaign$10,000
Fidelity Charitable Fund$6,437
Pace University Land Use Ctr$2,500
Palisades Nature Assn$1,000
Island Press$1,000
Englewood Historical Society$350
Fred Dolan Art Academey$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPUR: $3k → 10%Pace University Land Use Ctr: $3k → 9%English Speaking Union: $10k → 17%Fred Dolan Art Academey: $150 → 28%Island Press: $1k → 14%Palisades Nature Assn: $1k → 7%Greenfaith: $25k → 8%New Jersey Futures: $3k → 11%Virginia Organizing: $15k → 8%Regional Plan Association: $65k → 17%Palisades Nature Assn: $50 → 7%TriState Transportation Campaign: $10k → 17%Englewood Historical Society: $350 → 7%Regional Plan Association: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC — $85,000 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INCVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INCGREENFAITH INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentGREENFAITH INCTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION …+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Fidelity Charitable Fund — $6,437 · OtherFidelity Charitab…Pace University Land Use Ctr — $2,500 · OtherPace University L…SPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · OtherSPUR - SAN FRANCI…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant …+2 more — $500 · OtherPALISADES NATURE ASSOCIATION — $1,050 · Animals
Community Improvement$100,000Environment$36,000Other$24,437Animals$1,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC — $85,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALISADES NATURE ASSOCIATION — $1,050 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetISLAND PRESS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Oram Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph