Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oliveira R & D Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$516k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$227k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.6MArts & Culture$2k
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $227k
$4,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES$227,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$44,000
AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY$33,000
CARLETON COLLEGE$22,000
ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY$20,000
ST OLAF COLLEGE$16,000
DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$14,000
MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C$14,000
THE COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH$8,000
CONCORDIA COLLEGE$8,000
AUGUSTANA COLLEGE$7,000
SAINT CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$6,000
CENTURY COLLEGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMHERST COLLEGE: $8k → 12%CARLETON COLLEGE: $22k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $227k → 11%CONCORDIA COLLEGE: $8k → 11%SAINT PAUL COLLEGE: $7k → 14%MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL U: $7k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $6k → 11%DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $7k → 15%ST OLAF COLLEGE: $16k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $117k → 11%THE COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA: $10k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $6k → 11%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $7k → 15%ST OLAF: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $76k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $6k → 11%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $6k → 15%ST OLAF COLLEGE: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $64k → 11%SAINT CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%CARLETON COLLEGE: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $20k → 11%CARLETON COLLEGE: $7k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $12k → 11%ST OLAF COLLEGE: $7k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $44k → 14%ST CATHERINE'S UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%N HENNEPIN CC: $13k → 11%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $14k → 14%HERZING UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $13k → 14%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 14%AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $39k → 11%ST CATHERINE'S UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $36k → 11%AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $33k → 11%AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $28k → 11%AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%AUGSBURG: $12k → 11%DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $185k → 11%DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $102k → 11%DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C: $14k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C: $14k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C: $11k → 11%MCTC: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
SD
IA
RI
UT
MO
KS
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 28 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+9%

Still filing today

57%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $301k · revenue +4%
  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $156k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    4× · 2022–2025 · $74k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • A
    AUGSBURG
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • M
    MCTC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
9
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
10
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carleton College; the most unlike its peers is The Dartmouth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $301,000 · EducationDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $155,500 · EducationAUGSBURG UNIVERSITYUniversity of St Thomas: $74,000 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationST CATHERINE UNIVERSITYCARLETON COLLEGE: $37,000 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE: $33,000 · Education+13 more: $126,000 · Education+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $344,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIESUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $171,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAMINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C: $49,628 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL C+33 more: $208,342 · Other+33 more
Education$791,500Other$773,470

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $301,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $155,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $74,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN COLLEGE INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEckerd College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DARTMOUTH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oliveira R & D Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oliveira R & D Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Champlain College Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Oliveira R & D Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Oliveira R & D Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oliveira R & D’s filings →

More from the funding graph