Skip to content

· Public charity

The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ

The organization was established to facilitate the development of courses and curricula in arthitectural lighting design

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$267kHealth$18kHuman Services$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $49,125, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,875 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$18,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$11,625
COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO$7,500
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$6,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WENTWORTH INST OF TECH: $6k → 16%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 22%CAL POLY CORPORATION: $9k → 12%OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $8k → 14%RPI: $8k → 11%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $18k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 18%TENNESSEE STATE: $6k → 14%COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO: $8k → 14%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA: $18k → 24%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST & STATE U: $15k → 21%Pennsylvania State: $6k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 22%CAL POLY CORPORATION: $5k → 12%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $12k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 18%COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO: $8k → 14%CAL POLY CORPORATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
AR
TN
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 8 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$178k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CAL POLY CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +81%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k
  • VP
    VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
10
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbia College Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $52,125 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLEMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,750 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $11,625 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $8,000 · OtherC&C LIGHTING: $8,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $8,000 · Other+6 more: $24,000 · Other+6 moreCAL POLY CORPORATION: $19,250 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORATIONTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYColumbia College Chicago: $15,000 · EducationColumbia College ChicagoRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $8,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic Insti…OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $7,500 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESI…WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $6,250 · EducationWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHN…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC: $18,000 · Health
Other$200,500Education$74,000Health$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $19,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia College Chicago: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ?

Find your warmest path to The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Educ’s filings →

More from the funding graph