How much did THE NIKI AND JOE GREGORY CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of THE NIKI AND JOE GREGORY CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$750

Median grant

States reached

$1k

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTHWELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL$5,000
THE FRIENDS OF TJ FOUNDATION$2,500
LONG ISLAND CARES INC$750
HUNTINGTON COMMUNITY FIRST AID SQUA$250
HUNTINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT$100

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$39k · 5 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$39k

$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+46%

Still filing today

80%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TF
THE FRIENDS OF TJ FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +48%
LI
LONG ISLAND CARES INC
2× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +181%
FC
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +27%

Funded once

HH
HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL NORTH
one grant, 2022 · $25k
TM
THE MICHELLE PATERNOSTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +52%
DM
DON MONTI MEMORIAL RESEARCH FNDTN
one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hereditary Disease Foundation

To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease and other related disorders.

Health

The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

Mission of the research foundation for the state university of new york: a. to assist in developing and increasing the facilities of the state university of new york to provide more extensive educational opportunities for and service to…

Education

White Plains Hospital Medical Center

To offer high quality, acute health care and preventive medical care to all people who live in, work in, or visit westchester county and its surrounding areas.

Health

Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health

The Sally Edelman and Harry Gardner Cancer Research Foundation Inc

Raising funding and awareness for Cancer research.

—

Cardiology Foundation of New York

Health

Griffin's Guardians Inc

To raise awareness for pediatric cancer, fund pediatric cancer research and to provide support and financial assistance to children and their families battling cancer in central new york.

Health

Girls Incorporated of Long Island

The mission of girls incorporated of long island, is to inspire girls to be strong, smart, and bold. the organization provides school and community based programming that serves the unique needs of girls, ages 5-18, living in the nassau…

Education

Long Island University

Provide excellence and access in education to those who seek to expand their knowledge. see sch o.

—

Montefiore Health System Inc

To heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve.

Health

The Townwide Fund of Huntington Inc

Raising funds in the huntington area for distribution to carefully chosen local non-profit agencies that provide vital health and human services to community members in need, improving the quality and availability of services in the town…

—

Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute Inc

Guided by its motto, CURE-OSITY, the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute (HWI) creates novel strategies and technologies to promote the understanding, prevention, and treatment of many human diseases. HWI scientists conduct basic,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Children and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$72,000Philanthropy$9,750Health$6,100Youth Development$3,500Human Services$2,657Education$1,000Animals$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE NIKI AND JOE GREGORY CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE MICHELLE PATERNOSTER FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +52% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 465325065 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE MICHELLE PATERNOSTER FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Niki and Joe Gregory Charitable?

Find your warmest path to The Niki and Joe Gregory Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE NIKI AND JOE GREGORY CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Niki and Joe Gregory Charitable?

More from the funding graph

THE NIKI AND JOE GREGORY CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Niki and Joe Gregory Charitable?

More from the funding graph