Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Newsome Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$348kEducation$114kHuman Services$70kRecreation & Sports$41kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $155k
$8,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST$155,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$40,000
THE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELD$8,500
CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY: $5k → 16%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $45k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 5 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$456k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ASBURY UNITED METHODIST
    4× · 2022–2025 · $291k
  • Samford University
    4× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +32%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +197%

Funded once

  • AU
    ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $51k
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2024 · $45k · revenue 0%
  • IM
    IRONDALE METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
2
Wilson Medical Center Foundation

Assist Wilson Medical Center in its mission of promoting, improving, and restoring health.

Philanthropy
3
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
4
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
5
Friends of Kids With Cancer

Friends of kids with cancer is devoted to enriching the daily lives of children undergoing treatment for, and survivors of, cancer and blood-related diseases....(see schedule o)our mission is to be an advocate for these special kids…

Human Services
6
Texas Neurofibromatosis Foundation

To fund neurofibromatosis research and education and to provide for support groups for those facing the illness.

Health
7
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
8
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
9
Tennessee Kidney Foundation Inc

To empower and support those at risk or affected by kidney disease. Its vision is a Tennessee where the rate of kidney disease is minimized and everyone who needs care receives care.

Philanthropy
10
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
11
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
12
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concussion Legacy Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Monday Morning Quarterback Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY UNITED METHODIST: $291,372 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODISTASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50,750 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELD: $25,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELDUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20,000 · OtherThe Monday Morning Quarterback Club: $15,000 · Other+9 more: $30,000 · Other+9 moreSamford University: $105,000 · EducationSamford UniversityUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $45,000 · Human ServicesUNITED ME…GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesGRACE KLE…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthSMILE-A-MILE: $5,000 · Health
Other$432,122Education$105,000Human Services$52,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSamford University: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $45,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELD: $25,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetThe Monday Morning Quarterback Club: $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetGRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF RICKWOOD FIELD ↗
  • Who funds The Monday Morning Quarterback Club ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Altecstyslinger FoundationAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Newsome Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Newsome Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Newsome Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph