Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Newcomb Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$69kEducation$39kYouth Development$33kInternational$25kEnvironment$22kPublic Benefit$20kCrime & Legal$14kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$847k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GIFT SERVI$10,000
SEVA FOUNDATION$6,250
TIBETAN NUNS PROJECT$6,250
VOICES UNLIMITED$3,000
YOUTH RIGHTS JUSTICE$2,500
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CE$2,000
PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
COLON CANCER FAMILY REGISTRY$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAME$1,000
BIENESTAR$1,000
UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDA$1,000
INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE INSTITUTE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROOM TO GROW: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
NY
OR
IN
PA
CA
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 41 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
13

Total granted

$323k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+35%

Still filing today

56%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEVA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +61%
  • TI
    TEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +23%
  • VU
    VOICES UNLIMITED
    6× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +192% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PREVENTATIVE ON
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD - NYC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
New Progressive Network

Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon

Civil Rights
4
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
5
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
6
Pueblo Unido Pdx

Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.

Human Services
7
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc

See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what…

Philanthropy
8
Economic Opportunity Institute

Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.

Community Improvement
9
Oregon Tilth Inc

Oregon tilth is a leading nonprofit certifier, educator and advocate for sustainable organic agriculture and products since 1974. the organizations mission to make the food system and agriculture biologically sound and socially equitable…

—
10
Oregon Progress Forum

Next up amplifies the voice and leadership of diverse young people to achieve a more just and equitable oregon.

Environment
11
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
12
Northwest Network Btlg Survivors Abuse0

The Northwest Network of Bisexual Trans Lesbians and Gay Survivors of Abuse supports queer and trans survivors in reconnecting to their self-determination through advocacy-based counseling and community education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Voices Unlimited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
25/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GIFT SERVI: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GIFT SERVIIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD-GREATER WA AND N: $13,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD-GREATER WA AND NYOUTH RIGHTS JUSTICE: $12,500 · OtherYOUTH RIGHTS JUSTICEFOOTLOOSE SAILING ASSOCIATION: $11,000 · OtherUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherNW HEALTH LAW ADVOCATES: $10,500 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherPORTLAND STREET MEDICINE: $7,500 · Other+32 more: $109,250 · Other+32 moreSEVA FOUNDATION: $23,750 · InternationalSEVA FOUNDAT…TIBETAN NUNS PROJECT: $11,250 · InternationalTIBETAN NUNS…Mercy Corps: $1,500 · InternationalTEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE: $22,500 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS IN P…NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE AME…VOICES UNLIMITED: $18,000 · Public BenefitSEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterBIENESTAR INC: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL: $8,000 · EducationTHE EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,000 · EducationOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: $6,500 · EnvironmentBIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC: $3,250 · Environment
Other$217,250International$36,500Youth Development$32,500Public Benefit$18,000Housing & Shelter$15,500Education$11,000Environment$9,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $23,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE: $22,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetVOICES UNLIMITED: $18,000 over 6y, 63% of budgetTIBETAN NUNS PROJECT: $11,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL: $8,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPORTLAND STREET MEDICINE: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIENESTAR INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWaterWatch of Oregon: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINDIGENOUS LANGUAGE INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTransition Projects Inc: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLArche Portland: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUITABLE GIVING CIRCLE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPASSION IMPACT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds VOICES UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds TIBETAN NUNS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIENESTAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild ↗
  • Who funds WaterWatch of Oregon ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗
  • Who funds LArche Portland ↗
  • Who funds BIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITABLE GIVING CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Seattle Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Larson Legacy · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Newcomb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Newcomb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • WaterWatch of Oregon: 61% of income from government
  • LArche Portland: 59% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Portland Street Medicine: 32% of income from government
  • Transition Projects Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Sequoia Mental Health Services Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Transitional School: 7% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
  • Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc: 0% of income from government
  • All Classical Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Newcomb Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Newcomb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newcomb’s filings →

More from the funding graph