Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Neill Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$18kArts & Culture$12kCommunity Improvement$3kHealth$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$708Housing & Shelter$501Human Services$250Recreation & Sports$171Other$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$234
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,200
VORTEX THEATER$2,161
UNITY CHURCH OF THE HILLS$1,489
FIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCH$1,466
AUSTIN FILM FESTIVAL$1,353
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN$800
SMALL THEATER COMPANY$384
KUT$317
AUSTIN THEATER ALLIANCE$300
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$234
CITY THEATER$200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$175
Individual grant recipient$161
TAYLOR PRIDE$150
AUSTIN ZOO$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $81) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BACKPACK FRIENDS: $81 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 15 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$40k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+1%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Austin Film Festival Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • TJ
    THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +54%
  • CO
    CARITAS OF AUSTIN
    4× · 2020–2024 · $326 · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • GF
    GO FUND ME - ADDIE KINNEY CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $517 · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
3
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
4
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
5
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
6
The American Tinnitus Association

The mission of the american tinnitus association is to promote relief, help prevent, and research tinnitus cures, evidenced by its core values of compassion, credibility, and responsibility.compassion: evidenced in a spirit of hope…

Health
7
Austin Area Research Organization

Aaro, a non-partisan thought leader for central texas, has worked behind the scenes on critical regional issues since 1980. the membership is an intentionally diverse group of central texas leaders drawn from business, industry, education,…

—
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
American University

To advance knowledge, foster intellectual curiosity, build community, and empower lives of purpose, service, and leadership.

Education
11
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
12
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caritas of Austin; the most unlike its peers is Backpack Friends Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCH: $10,175 · OtherFIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $7,488 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUnity Church of the Hills: $7,128 · OtherUnity Church of the HillsVORTEX THEATER: $5,046 · OtherVORTEX THEATERKUT: $1,703 · Other+28 more: $6,672 · Other+28 moreAustin Film Festival Inc: $2,663 · Arts & CultureAustin Fil…AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $596 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THE…THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $517 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERIC…THE GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATRE INC: $364 · Arts & CultureTHE GEORGE…AUSTIN ZOO INC: $150 · Arts & CultureTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $2,656 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $259 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 · HealthBACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED: $81 · Human ServicesWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 · Environment
Other$38,212Arts & Culture$4,290Community Improvement$2,656Health$559Human Services$81Environment$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAustin Film Festival Inc: $2,663 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $2,656 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $596 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATRE INC: $364 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $326 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $259 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN ZOO INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED: $81 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Austin Film Festival Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Neill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Neill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph