Skip to content
The Neall Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Neall Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
102
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.3MInternational$1.2MEnvironment$950kHealth$845kHuman Services$831kCrime & Legal$564kHousing & Shelter$559kCivil Rights$500kOther$0
02FY2025 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k56 grants · $227k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $731k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $305k
$5,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION$125,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$120,000
MARYLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM$60,000
SHELTERBOX USA$40,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$35,000
VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE$30,000
MEDICAL MISSIONARIES$30,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION$30,000
NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$30,000
AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM$30,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$25,000
ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC$25,000
FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$25,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $30k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $40k → 10%HOMESTRETCH: $10k → 4%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $60k → 17%SHELTERBOX USA: $15k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $30k → 10%HOMESTRETCH: $10k → 4%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $50k → 17%SHELTERBOX USA: $25k → 10%HOMESTRETCH: $10k → 4%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $50k → 17%SHELTERBOX USA: $25k → 10%HOMESTRETCH: $10k → 4%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $40k → 17%SHELTERBOX USA: $25k → 10%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $40k → 17%SHELTERBOX USA: $25k → 10%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $35k → 17%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $35k → 17%AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM: $30k → 17%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $25k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $20k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $20k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $20k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $17k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $15k → 11%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $15k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION: $10k → 8%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $15k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION FOR HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 8%FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $10k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $25k → 6%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $25k → 6%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $25k → 6%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $15k → 6%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $15k → 6%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 126 repeat orgs$349k to everyone else

126 repeat relationships: 92 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

126
22

Total granted

$8.9M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+60%

Still filing today

60%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +123%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +98%
  • AA
    AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $340k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +60%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +41%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
10
Virginia Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives

Trade association for electric cooperatives

—
11
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
12
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Potomac Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/96
Grantees still filing
76/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC: $1,070,000 · OtherTHE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INCMARYLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM: $620,000 · OtherMARYLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEMBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $225,000 · Other+107 more: $3,882,500 · Other+107 moreAN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC: $340,000 · Human ServicesAN ACHIEVABLE D…SHELTERBOX USA INC: $215,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA …NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VIRGIN…FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $157,000 · Human ServicesFIRST STEP A RE…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNIT…BLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $65,000 · Human ServicesHomestretch Inc: $63,000 · Human Services+5 more: $84,000 · Human Services+5 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…Medical Missionaries Inc: $120,000 · InternationalMedical Miss…ALIGHT: $93,000 · InternationalALIGHTWATERORG: $67,500 · InternationalWATERORGWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $60,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIO…+5 more: $53,000 · International+5 moreLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $90,000 · EnvironmentInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $57,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $47,000 · EnvironmentAlice Ferguson Foundation Inc: $40,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $40,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: $36,000 · EnvironmentSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC: $27,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION: $24,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentCOAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH INC: $23,500 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $21,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentVIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE: $18,000 · EnvironmentAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $18,000 · Environment+1 more: $7,000 · EnvironmentEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $155,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC: $41,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $16,000 · Civil RightsCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50,000 · HealthINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $14,000 · Health+1 more: $6,000 · HealthTHE HAVEN INC: $76,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $57,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat For Humanity Virginia: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterMARIAN HOMES INC: $14,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,797,500Human Services$1,234,000International$993,500Environment$517,500Civil Rights$352,000Health$220,000Housing & Shelter$182,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC: $1,070,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC: $340,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $215,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $190,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC: $170,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $157,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $155,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $150,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL: $136,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMedical Missionaries Inc: $120,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetALIGHT: $93,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetELKTON AREA UNITED SERVICES INC: $90,500 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN INC: $76,000 over 9y, 85% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $73,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERORG: $67,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY: $65,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO RIVER VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION: $65,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $65,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHomestretch Inc: $63,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $59,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $57,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $57,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $54,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $52,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSERVE INC: $52,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHaymarket Regional Food Pantry: $49,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $47,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $47,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $46,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC: $41,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetAlice Ferguson Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $40,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGABRIEL HOMES INC: $39,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $37,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: $36,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHabitat For Humanity Virginia: $35,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP A RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Medical Missionaries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds ELKTON AREA UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO RIVER VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Chari…Sentara HealthCharlottesville Area …Philip L Graham Fund …The Community Foundat…United Way of the Nat…Cassiopeia Foundation…The Jv Schiro Zavela …The Peterson Family F…The Oak Hill FundThe Morris and Gwendo…The Northrop Grumman …
Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA23.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Sentara Health · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Cassiopeia Foundation Inc · The Jv Schiro Zavela Foundation · The Peterson Family Foundation Inc · The Oak Hill Fund · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Northrop Grumman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Neall Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Neall Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Voices for Children Foundation Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Dorchester Center for the Arts Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Access Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Comfort Cases Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Neall Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Neall Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 160 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home