Skip to content

Florida · Public charity

The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd

Nccer's mission is to provide rigorous and relevant workforce development solutions that create opportunities for individual career advancement and support industry growth. The organization develops and maintains standardized construction training programs and certification assessments for over 40 crafts, provides field leadership…

$15k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$10k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$46M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$10k0%
FY20241$10k0%
FY20232$30k0%
FY20224$76k25%
FY20216$185k67%
FY20203$70k0%
FY20192$30k0%
FY20184$81k50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$553k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Agc Education and Research Foundation Inc$140,00054%
Folds of Honor Foundation$120,00060%
Associated Builders and Contractors Inc$100,00010%
National Technical Honor Society$60,00061%
Construction Education Foundation of Ga$50,00021%
Group Skillsusa Inc$22,0002n/a
Trimmer Construction Education Foundation$20,00015%
Jlg Industries Inc$10,5001n/a
Sundt Foundation$10,0001n/a
Dallas College Foundation Inc$10,00010%
Florida Credit Union$10,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAgc Education and Research Foundation Inc: $140,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetFolds of Honor Foundation: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAssociated Builders and Contractors Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNational Technical Honor Society: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetConstruction Education Foundation of Ga: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTrimmer Construction Education Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetDallas College Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlorida Credit Union: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd with peer funders

About The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd

How much does The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd give?
The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd reported 1 itemized grants totaling $10,000, out of $15,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Agc Education and Research Foundation Inc ($140k), Folds of Honor Foundation ($120k), Associated Builders and Contractors Inc ($100k).
Does The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd based?
The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph