Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Naresh C Jain Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
10
States reached
$60k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of The Naresh C Jain Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Naresh C Jain Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $71k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
4
’18
4
’19
6
’20
6
’21
8
’22
7
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$866kFood & Nutrition$440kEducation$85kHealth$22kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k16 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$551
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BHAGWAN MAHAVIR SEWA KENDRA$60,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$3,501
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,102
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$1,102
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$551
UNION RESCUE MISSION$551
PARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION$551
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$551
THE SMILE TRAIN$551
AMERICAN ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$551
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$551
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$502
SALVATION ARMY$251
UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF$251
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$251
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($970k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($457k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $551 → 11%FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $866k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $151 → 10%GIVE2ASIA: $2k → 10%UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $251 → 14%THE SMILE TRAIN: $551 → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $1k → 28%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $201 → 14%PARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION: $551 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $5k → 17%AMERICAN ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $551 → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 22%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $551 → 7%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $551 → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $201 → 8%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $502 → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $101 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $65k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $151 → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $551 → 28%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $151 → 14%PARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION: $151 → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $4k → 17%AMERICAN ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $551 → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $551 → 22%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $551 → 7%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $452 → 14%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $452 → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $101 → 10%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $252 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $101 → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $452 → 28%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $101 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $4k → 17%AMERICAN ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $201 → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $452 → 22%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $251 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $251 → 10%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $151 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $151 → 22%SALVATION ARMY: $551 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $251 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $501 → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $201 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($457k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$440k · 7 grants
Canada$17k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 90% of The Naresh C Jain Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Naresh C Jain Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 32% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 16 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$474k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+44%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +89%
  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MU
    MCMASTER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +44%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Globalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $101 · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
6
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Make-a-Wish Foundation International

None

Human Services
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Centreville Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $865,592 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDBHAGWAN MAHAVIR SEWA KENDRA: $440,000 · OtherBHAGWAN MAHAVIR SEWA KENDRAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA+17 more: $45,731 · Other+17 moreAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,706 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,355 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $201 · Health+1 more: $101 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,656 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA: $1,500 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,500 · EducationUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,655 · Human Services
Community Improvement$865,592Other$550,731Health$3,363International$3,156Education$2,500Human Services$1,655

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $865,592 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,706 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,656 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,655 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,355 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $551 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTREVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTREVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Naresh C Jain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Naresh C Jain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Naresh C Jain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph