Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mountain Room Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$18kArts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$6kAnimals$2kEducation$1kFood & Nutrition$1kHuman Services$500Youth Development$250
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$15,000
WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATRE$7,500
UAFICA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$4,000
FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION$2,500
KUAZ - NPR$1,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN AZ$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$1,000
MAKE MUSIC NEW YORK$250
CFSA - VENTANA CANYON MAD$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 8 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$40k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+139%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +578%
  • FT
    FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +109%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Southern Arizona
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWNgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +138%
  • GS
    GREEN-HERNANDEZ SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • MF
    MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +139%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Symphony Society

The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.

Arts & Culture
2
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
3
Ballet Arts Foundation

Ballet tucson is dedicated to bringing iconic, world-class dance performances and rising star artists to tucson and to sharing explorative experiences that inspire hope and excitement in our community.

Arts & Culture
4
Fox Theatre Inc F/K/a Atlanta Landmarks Inc

To preserve and share the fox theatre

Arts & Culture
5
The New York Festival of Song Inc

NYFOS is dedicated to creating intimate song concerts of great beauty and originality, weaving music, poetry, history and humor into unforgettable evenings of compelling theater, entertaining, educating and creating community among…

—
6
The Phoenix Theatre Company and Subsidiary

Phoenix theatre creates exceptional theatrical experiences to articulate messages that inspire hope and understanding.

Arts & Culture
7
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
8
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture
9
Worcester Center for Performing Arts Inc

Worcester center for performing arts promotes and/or hosts more than 250 performances and welcomes more than 150,000 attendees each year. the hanover theatre conservatory reaches more than 700 students in theatre, technical theatre and…

Arts & Culture
10
The Studio Theatre Inc

Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.

Arts & Culture
11
The City Theatre Company Inc

To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
12
Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona

The Arts Foundation mission is to advance artistic expression, civic participation, and equitable economic growth of our diverse community by supporting, promoting, and advocating for arts and culture in our region.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fox Tucson Theatre Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Youth On Their Own. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $17,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S R…THE WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATER: $8,500 · Arts & CultureTHE WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATERFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATIONMake Music New York Inc: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureUAFICA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $6,000 · OtherUAFICA CAPITAL CAMPAIGNKUAZ - NPR: $2,000 · OtherKUAZ - NPRCFSA - VENTANA CANYON MAD: $850 · OtherCFSA - VENTANA CANYON MA…+2 more: $400 · OtherHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $1,500 · AnimalsCommunity Food Bank Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 · Human Services
Health$17,500Arts & Culture$12,750Other$9,250Animals$1,500Food & Nutrition$1,000Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATER: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake Music New York Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mountain Room Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mountain Room Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Weston Playhouse Theater: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mountain Room’s filings →

More from the funding graph