Skip to content
The Moulder Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moulder Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$548kEducation$400kEnvironment$50kInternational$45kPhilanthropy$30kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$100,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$50,000
IGG4WARD FOUNDATION$25,000
LET EVERY WOMAN KNOW - ALASKA$25,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$10,000
VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
UNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE & BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IGG4WARD FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 22%LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOM FDN: $20k → 9%UNICEF USA: $13k → 17%VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 19%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $13k → 9%UNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE & BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $10k → 12%SOUTH KINGSTOWN LAND TRUST: $50k → 7%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF: $5k → 14%LET EVERY WOMAN KNOW - ALASKA: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%IGG4WARD FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%TEMPLE UNIV HOSPITAL EMERGENCY FUND: $125k → 22%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 17%VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 19%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $10k → 9%LET EVERY WOMAN KNOW - ALASKA: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $10k → 22%DEBRA OF AMERICA: $15k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC: $10k → 9%LET EVERY WOMAN KNOW - ALASKA: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%TEMPLE UNIV HOSPITAL EMERGENCY FUND: $25k → 22%Debra of America: $13k → 17%LET EVERY WOMAN KNOW - ALASKA: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $10k → 22%DEBRA OF AMERICA: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$950k · 9 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$950k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-4%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +52%
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +13%
  • LE
    Let Every Woman Know - Alaska
    4× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SOUTH KINGSTOWN LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • LA
    LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOM FDN
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
11
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Institute for Cancer Research; the most unlike its peers is Let Every Woman Know - Alaska. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Chicago: $200,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $200,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Highe…IGG4WARD FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationIGG4WARD FOUNDATIONTEMPLE UNIV HOSPITAL EMERGENCY FUND: $150,000 · OtherTEMPLE UNIV HOSPITAL EM…DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $37,500 · OtherDYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSI…LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOM FDN: $20,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOM FD…FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherLet Every Woman Know - Alaska: $130,000 · HealthLet Every Woman Know …CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $55,000 · HealthCONQUER CANCER FOUNDA…The Institute For Cancer Research: $10,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · HealthSOUTH KINGSTOWN LAND TRUST: $50,000 · EnvironmentSave The Children Federation Inc: $32,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,500 · InternationalVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE AND BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$525,000Other$222,500Health$205,000Environment$50,000International$45,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLet Every Woman Know - Alaska: $130,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetIGG4WARD FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH KINGSTOWN LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetDYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $37,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE AND BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moulder Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moulder Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Moulder Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Moulder Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moulder Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home