Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$921kHealth$191kReligion$163kFood & Nutrition$87kCrime & Legal$72kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
$2,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$18,000
SAJ$18,000
CONGREGATION BETH DAVID$11,400
SHARON HOSPITAL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$9,919
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NYC (NAMI-NYC)$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$5,000
MAZON$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
CITY HARVEST DONOR SYSTEMS$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC$5,000
SHEFFIELD KIWANIS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIVING RESOURCES: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $3k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $3k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $3k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $3k → 16%CHORE SERVICE: $3k → 9%CHORE SERVICE: $1k → 9%CHORE SERVICE: $1k → 9%CHORE SERVICE: $1k → 9%PROJECT SAGE: $2k → 9%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 9%PROJECT SAGE: $1k → 9%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 33 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$1.5M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+22%

Still filing today

45%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +25%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +19%
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • J
    JDC
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • PA
    PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE MEMBERSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • YT
    Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Selfhelp Community Services Inc

A non-profit organization dedicated to maintaining the independence and dignity of seniors and at risk populations through a spectrum of services. selfhelp is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to maintaining the independence and…

Human Services
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Inc

& part iii, line 1: the mission of the nassau-suffolk hospital council, inc. (nshc) is to:- provide a forum for the exchange of ideas regarding the development of regional, state, and national health policy,- identify key policy issues…

—
10
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life; the most unlike its peers is The One East Sixtieth Street Historical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $860,425 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTSAJ: $72,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH DAVID: $50,200 · Other+34 more: $404,668 · Other+34 moreMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 · HealthTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $8,000 · Health+3 more: $5,300 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $46,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHORE SERVICE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesLIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT SAGE INC: $4,800 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $22,500 · Food & NutritionYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $10,000 · EducationHOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC: $4,000 · EducationNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $3,000 · EducationSHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,387,293Health$118,300Philanthropy$51,000Human Services$30,300Food & Nutrition$22,500Education$17,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $46,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHORE SERVICE INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC: $4,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARON LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE EAST SIXTIETH STREET HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds SHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN FORSYTH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHORE SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter and Phyllis Ann Borten FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter and Phyllis Ann Borten Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · MJPM Foundation · Peter and Helen Haje Foundation · The Robert L and Jean Clarke Family Foundation · The Hallingby Family Foundation Inc · Low Road Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Rhoades-Robinson Fund · Easton Family Fund · Tilia Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph