· Public charity
The Morrison & Foerster Foundation
THE MORRISON & FOERSTER FOUNDATION enables the people of morrison & foerster to focus their charitable giving on nonprofit organizations serving people in the communities in which the firm's personnel live and work.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 228 grants below total $4,573,927 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,871,713 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,297,786 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k55 grants · $395k
- $10k–50k158 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $591k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS | $335,000 |
| MYRIAD USA INC | $256,418 |
| OAKLAND REACH | $150,000 |
| DE NOVO CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HEALING INC | $112,500 |
| DREAM PROJECT INC | $100,600 |
| ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC | $100,000 |
| DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $100,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF NYC INC | $85,000 |
| SCIENTIFIC ADVENTURES | $75,000 |
| BAY AREA LEGAL AID | $75,000 |
| LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA | $75,000 |
| BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $66,668 |
| THE JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY CENTER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO | $50,000 |
| PROJECT GLIMMER | $50,000 |
| NETWORK FOR VICTIM RECOVERY IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $851k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
201 repeat relationships — 162 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABAY AREA LEGAL AID5× · 2020–2024 · $425k · revenue +46%
- LCLawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area5× · 2020–2024 · $340k · revenue +64%
- TJTHE JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY CENTER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO5× · 2020–2024 · $243k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -51%
ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -66%- ICINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSSone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The Legal Aid Association of California, the statewide membership of legal services nonprofits, serves its members through advocacy and other support in efforts to provide legal assistance to low-income Californians and ensure access to…
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Changelawyers and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
353 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 353 of the 373 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area ↗
- Who funds THE JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY CENTER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid at Work ↗
- Who funds New York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc ↗
- Who funds Advocates for Children of New York ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds SILICON VALLEY CAMPAIGN FOR LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The Oakland REACH ↗
- Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds DE NOVO CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HEALING ↗
- Who funds ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds DREAM PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds Law Foundation of Silicon Valley ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC ↗
- Who funds DC BAR PRO BONO CENTER ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHANGELAWYERS ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds The John Paul Stevens Foundation ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES NYC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds KIND INC ↗
- Who funds Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Equal Justice Works · Littler Mendelson Foundation Inc Attn Tax Manager · Venable Foundation Inc · California Access to Justice Commission · Perkins Coie Foundation · California Changelawyers · Munger Tolles & Olson Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Morrison & Foerster Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Camp Rehoboth Inc — 33% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- De Novo Center for Justice and Healing — 9% of income from government
- Shore Legal Access Inc — 9% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Morrison & Foerster Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Morrison & Foerster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.