Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morgan E Cline Perpetual Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$920kHuman Services$189kArts & Culture$88kMembership Benefit$48kRecreation & Sports$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kPhilanthropy$25kEmployment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
CITY OF EXLINE$1,000
THE LORD'S CUPBOARD$500
FUREVER FRIENDS RESCUE OF APPANOOSE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%KIDS WORLD: $5k → 10%RATHBUN LAKE AREA YMCA: $50k → 14%RATHBUN LAKE AREA YMCA: $25k → 14%KIDS WORLD: $22k → 14%RATHBUN LAKE AREA YMCA: $20k → 14%KIDS WORLD: $20k → 14%RATHBUN LAKE AREA YMCA: $20k → 14%KIDS WORLD: $4k → 14%KIDS WORLD: $3k → 14%RATHBUN LAKE AREA YMCA: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$1.4M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+48%

Still filing today

42%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RATHBUN LAKE AREA YOUNG MENS CHRIST
    5× · 2017–2022 · $115k · revenue +10%
  • KW
    KIDS WORLD INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +18%
  • CC
    CENTERVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MV
    MOULTON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • AA
    APPANOOSE ALL PLAY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • 1C
    18-80 CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Apple Daycare Inc

Provide a well rounded, affordable and dependable daycare facility for parents with children growing up in a rural north iowa area.

Human Services
2
Calhoun County Economic Development

Promote and service the communities within calhoun county

—
3
Ames Community Preschool Center

To provide consistent, reliable, safe and affordable childcare to Ames area children that engages each child and encourages his or her best personal growth and development.

Human Services
4
Adams County Development Council

To enhance, retain, and attract commercial, industrial, and agricultural growth, development, and diversity within adams county and its cities, towns and ports.

Community Improvement
5
Osage Community Daycare

Providing day care services to mitchell county, iowa, and the surrounding area. 50 to 70 children are serviced on a daily basis.

Human Services
6
Caseville Chamber of Commerce

To promote the community and to inform the public of the local business within the community. additionaly, to host events to draw tourism to the community of caseville

Community Improvement
7
Appanoose Economic Development Corp

To assist in quality job creation that will serve to increase both the economic vitality of the area and the quality of life enjoyed by the residents of the county

—
8
Caswell County Chamber of Commerce

To promote the economic and civic interests of individuals, community leaders, businesses and institutions in caswell county.

—
9
Jefferson Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development in jefferson wi for its members

—
10
Itasca Economic Development Corpor

To grow the itasca county economy through education, research and outreach that creates business opportunities

Community Improvement
11
Fayette County Commission On Aging Incorporated

The fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and above, and providing the…

—
12
Oconee County Chamber of Commerce

To promote local business and economic development in the county

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chariton Valley Regional Housing Trust Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EducationINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF EXLINE: $49,000 · OtherCITY OF EXLINEAPPANOOSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 · OtherAPPANOOSE COUNTY HISTORICAL S…MOULTON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $20,500 · OtherAPPANOOSE ALL PLAY INC: $20,000 · Other18-80 CLUB: $20,000 · OtherCENTERVILLE FIRE AND RESCUE: $20,000 · OtherDRAKE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherHISTORIC PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $20,000 · OtherAPPANOOSE COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES: $20,000 · OtherLORDS CUPBOARD INC: $18,500 · OtherREACHING ALL PEOPLE TOGETHER (RAPT): $15,200 · Other+9 more: $36,634 · Other+9 moreRATHBUN LAKE AREA YOUNG MENS CHRIST: $115,150 · Human ServicesRATHBUN LAK…KIDS WORLD INC: $53,500 · Human ServicesKIDS WORLD …APPANOOSE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITON VALLEY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTERVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFUREVER FRIENDS RESCUE OF APPANOOSE COUNTY: $3,502 · Animals
Education$1,000,000Other$429,834Human Services$168,650Philanthropy$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000Animals$3,502

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetRATHBUN LAKE AREA YOUNG MENS CHRIST: $115,150 over 5y, 12% of budgetKIDS WORLD INC: $53,500 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetAPPANOOSE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCHARITON VALLEY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetAPPANOOSE COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCENTERVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCENTERVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFUREVER FRIENDS RESCUE OF APPANOOSE COUNTY: $3,502 over 2y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RATHBUN LAKE AREA YOUNG MENS CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds APPANOOSE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITON VALLEY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds APPANOOSE COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CENTERVILLE CONCERT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTERVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds FUREVER FRIENDS RESCUE OF APPANOOSE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · South Central Iowa Community Founda · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morgan E Cline Perpetual Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morgan E Cline Perpetual Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Morgan E Cline Perpetual Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Morgan E Cline Perpetual Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morgan E Cline Perpetual’s filings →

    More from the funding graph