Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Moosemoss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$248kArts & Culture$153kScience & Tech$147kEducation$142kFood & Nutrition$86kHousing & Shelter$54kHuman Services$23kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE SEA COAST MISSION$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SCHOODIC INSTITUTE$25,000
RSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS$23,000
PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM$22,000
HANCOCK COUNTY TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC RELATIONS (WOODLAWN)$15,000
RSU 24 FOR MARINE PATHWAYS$10,000
WABANAKI PUBLICH HEALTH AND WELLNESS$8,000
NEXT STEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$8,000
FRENCHMAN BAY LIBRARY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RSU 24 MARINE PATHWAYS: $20k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY: $25k → 16%RSU 24 MARINE PATHWAYS: $14k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY: $4k → 16%RSU 24 FOR MARINE PATHWAYS: $10k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%FRENCHMAN BAY LIBRARY: $6k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%FRENCHMAN BAY LIBRARY: $6k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%RSU 24 SCUBA: $3k → 11%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $20k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $25k → 11%RSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS: $23k → 11%RSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS: $22k → 11%RSU 24: $22k → 11%RSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS: $22k → 11%RSU 24: $20k → 11%RSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS: $20k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $19k → 11%HANCOCK COUNTY TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC RELATIONS (WOODLAWN): $15k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 11%NEXT STEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%NEXT STEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $26k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $20k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%COMMUNITY CLOSET ELLSWORTH: $13k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $17k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%COMMUNITY CLOSET ELLSWORTH: $10k → 11%SCHOODIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%MAINE SEA COAST MISSION: $40k → 11%COMMUNITY CLOSET ELLSWORTH: $10k → 11%EMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%EMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%EMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%EMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%EMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$856k · 12 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +122% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$856k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+122%
+50%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Maine Seacoast Mission
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +98%
  • PM
    PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +6%
  • SI
    SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k · revenue +184%

Funded once

  • GS
    Good Shepherd Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +50%
  • R2
    RSU 24 SCUBA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Maine Seacoast Mission: $240,000 · OtherMaine Seacoast MissionRSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYS: $87,000 · OtherRSU 24 MEDICAL PATHWAYSEMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTER: $48,000 · OtherEMMAUS HOMELESS SHELTERRSU 24: $42,250 · OtherRSU 24RSU 24 MARINE PATHWAYS: $33,600 · OtherRSU 24 MARINE PATHWAYSIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · Other+5 more: $47,000 · Other+5 morePENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $130,000 · Arts & CulturePENOBSCOT MARINE M…HANCOCK COUNTY TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC RESERVATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHANCOCK COUNTY TRU…SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK: $117,787 · EnvironmentSCHOODIC INSTI…LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $69,500 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AN…Good Shepherd Food Bank: $6,000 · Food & NutritionGood Shep…
Other$559,850Arts & Culture$145,000Environment$117,787Food & Nutrition$75,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaine Seacoast Mission: $240,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $130,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK: $117,787 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $69,500 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetHANCOCK COUNTY TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC RESERVATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maine Seacoast Mission ↗
  • Who funds PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC RESERVATION ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moosemoss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moosemoss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Moosemoss Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Moosemoss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moosemoss’ filings →

    More from the funding graph