Skip to content

· Public charity

The Missouri Valley Conference

Provide intercollegiate athletics a proper role in education, to organize, control and supervise intercollegiate athletics among the institutions of the conference and to establish standards and promote scholarship and sportsmanship among the conference members.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$322k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$14M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $572k
$178,083
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$321,622
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$250,488
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$223,992
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$222,261
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$192,473
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$178,083
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO$122,277
VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY$113,296
DRAKE UNIVERSITY$111,790
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$99,931
BRADLEY UNIVERSITY$68,516
UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE$66,635
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $114k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $307k → 15%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $101k → 14%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $150k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $96k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $209k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $258k → 23%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $222k → 19%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $112k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $302k → 15%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $100k → 14%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $149k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $95k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $209k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $253k → 23%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $213k → 19%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $106k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $286k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $148k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $92k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $199k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $250k → 23%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $285k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $146k → 9%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $202k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $250k → 23%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $99k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $263k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $125k → 9%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $177k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $243k → 23%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $98k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $262k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $122k → 9%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $192k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $234k → 23%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $97k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $243k → 15%VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY: $113k → 9%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $166k → 19%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $228k → 23%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $95k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $224k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $190k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $144k → 14%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $209k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $122k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 13 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$14M
$83k

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +24%
  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +97%
  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +105% · 72% of their budget

Funded once

  • WS
    WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOC INC
    one grant, 2017 · $83k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
11
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
12
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Southern Illinois University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,647,496 · EducationILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,264,340 · EducationMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,988,403 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $1,608,670 · EducationIndiana State University Foundation IncUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $1,576,483 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATIONTHE LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INC: $999,934 · EducationTHE LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INCDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $851,600 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $629,524 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $493,024 · Education+2 more: $546,654 · EducationMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $435,464 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $266,136 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOC INC: $83,206 · Other
Education$13,606,128Other$784,806

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,647,496 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,264,340 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,988,403 over 9y, 72% of budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $1,608,670 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $1,576,483 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INC: $999,934 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $851,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $629,524 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $493,024 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $346,017 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $200,637 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Missouri Valley Conference funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Missouri Valley Conference. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Missouri Valley Conference’s filings →

    More from the funding graph