· Private foundation
The Milton Pollack Family Foundation Inc C/O Stephanie Miller
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of THE MILTON POLLACK FAMILY FOUNDATION INC C/O STEPHANIE MILLER’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k34 grants · $49k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MILTON POLLACK FAMILY FOUNDATION DONOR ADVISED FUND | $1,039,787 |
| WESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE | $9,506 |
| SCARSDALE EDGEMONT FAMILY COUNSELING SVS | $5,000 |
| CONGREGATION MICAH | $3,705 |
| WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL | $3,100 |
| THE SMITH FUND | $2,500 |
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER | $2,500 |
| UJA FEDERATION | $1,800 |
| TENNESSEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $1,500 |
| MY MONEY WORKSHOP | $1,500 |
| ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND | $1,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $1,500 |
| MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $1,100 |
| UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM | $1,000 |
| LAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSCARSDALEEDGEMONT FAM COUNSELING5× · 2018–2022 · $35k · revenue +45%
- WPWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +71%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC5× · 2018–2022 · $8k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $2k
- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR NONDUALITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +160%
- TSTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nea Foundation for the Improvement of Education and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SCARSDALEEDGEMONT FAM COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SCARSDALE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MY MONEY WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (TPAC) MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC ↗
- Who funds SCARSDALE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds METROPOLIS CC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SCARSDALE ADULT SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEA FOUNDATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR NONDUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The V & L Marx Foundation · Charles S Raizen Foundation Inc · The Blum Family Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Forward Vision · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Scarlett Family Foundation · Siegel Family Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Milton Pollack Family Foundation Inc C/O Stephanie Miller funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Milton Pollack Family Foundation Inc C/O Stephanie Miller?
Find your warmest path to The Milton Pollack Family Foundation Inc C/O Stephanie Miller through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.