Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mikesell Wade Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$229kHealth$50kEducation$27kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$9kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$563k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO$25,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES$5,000
EBINGER SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
ONEKAMA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FUND$5,000
ST PAUL OF THE CROSS$5,000
GIANT STEPS ILLINOIS INC$5,000
CENTRAL CITY MINISTRY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST PAUL OF THE CROSS: $5k → 11%ONEKAMA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FUND: $5k → 13%SAINT JOHN'S BY THE LAKE: $1k → 17%THE HEALING BARN: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $35k → 12%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN: $5k → 15%LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%GIANT STEPS ILLINOIS INC: $5k → 7%EBINGER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SAINT JOHN'S BY THE LAKE: $1k → 17%THE HEALING BARN: $3k → 12%BOYS CLUB OF TOLEDO: $33k → 12%LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%GIANT STEPS ILLINOIS INC: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $30k → 12%LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%GIANT STEPS ILLINOIS INC: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $30k → 12%LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $25k → 12%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES: $5k → 18%BOYS CLUB OF TOLEDO: $21k → 12%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES: $5k → 18%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $20k → 12%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NW OH: $5k → 18%FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $15k → 12%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES: $5k → 18%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NW OH: $4k → 18%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES: $5k → 18%CAMP COURAGEOUS: $1k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS WESTERN LAKE ERIE: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS WESTERN LAKE ERIE: $5k → 18%PROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%PROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%CENTRAL CITY MINISTRY: $3k → 18%CENTRAL CITY MINISTRY: $3k → 18%TOLEDO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $1k → 18%TOLEDO SEAGATE FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 18%TOLEDO SEAGATE FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$335k · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$335k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+29%

Still filing today

33%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPublic BenefitFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $155k
  • BC
    BOYS CLUB OF TOLEDO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $54k
  • PF
    PROMEDICA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • CC
    COURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas University

Thomas university is an independent, not for profit, institution of higher education with undergraduate and graduate programs that prepare students for successful careers and responsible citizenship in a rapidly changing and complex world.

Education
2
Columbus Center for Human Services Inc

Inspiring life journeys

Human Services
3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
5
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
6
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
8
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
9
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
10
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
11
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
12
Lakeside Curative Services Inc

Provide training and community engagement for youth and individuals with varying abilities to enhance their self-esteem and quality of life.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in; the most unlike its peers is Ebinger School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDO: $155,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB-TOLEDOBOYS CLUB OF TOLEDO: $54,000 · OtherBOYS CLUB OF TOLEDOBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORES: $20,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ERIE SHORESIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS WESTERN LAKE ERIE: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $33,500 · Other+6 moreLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $17,000 · EducationLOURDES UNI…Giant Steps Illinois Inc: $15,000 · EducationGiant Steps…EBINGER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationEBINGER SCH…PROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Public BenefitPROMEDICA…TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN: $5,000 · HealthCOURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · HealthTOLEDO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$287,500Education$37,000Public Benefit$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$6,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEBINGER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROMEDICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Giant Steps Illinois Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EBINGER SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN ↗
  • Who funds COURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mikesell Wade Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mikesell Wade Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mikesell Wade’s filings →

    More from the funding graph