Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mike & Evelyn Walsh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$100kReligion$45kHealth$33kYouth Development$20kPublic Benefit$15kAnimals$10kEducation$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LaPorte Fire Protection District$20,000
Sierra Nevada Memorial Hosp Foundat$10,660
Nevada County Search Rescue$10,000
A New Day$10,000
NC Law Enforcement Fire Protection$9,000
Placer 10-35 Foundation$5,000
City of Grass Valley$5,000
Bright Futures for Youth$5,000
Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital Founda$5,000
Rudiger Foundation$5,000
Frontline Healing Foundation$2,000
Nevada County Toy Run$1,000
Western Nevada County Recreation Sv$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Bright Futures for Youth: $10k → 11%Bright Futures for Youth: $5k → 11%Bright Futures for Youth: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$202k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+50%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthReligionHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +40%
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +93%
  • RF
    RUDIGER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • WP
    Wildlife Preservation Climate Resea
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • NC
    Nevada County Sheriff's Management
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Nevada Beagle Rescue Foundation

Found shelter and safed dogs by promoting education of responsible animal ownership

Animals
2
Kiss for Homeless Animals
Animals
3
Working Dogs of Nevada Rescue

Our mission is to save, rehabilitate and rehome animals which may otherwise be euthanized at shelters due to their behavioural issues.

—
4
Liberty Dogs Foundation
Health
5
The Nevada Bighorns Foundation
Education
6
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
7
Southern Nevada Animal Rescue League

Rescue domesticated animals, provide any needed medical care and find them safe forever homes

Animals
8
Sacramento Police Canine Association

Care for retired police canine dogs.

Animals
9
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
10
Sierra County Humane Society-Desert Haven Animal Refuge

Abused animal care,public education, spay & neuter of animals to prevent unwanted births, providing a pet cemetary for animals.

Animals
11
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
12
Nevada Boxer Rescue

Rescue, rehab, and place abandoned dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sammies Friends; the most unlike its peers is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC Law Enforcement Fire Protection: $50,362 · OtherNC Law Enforcement Fire ProtectionNevada County Search Rescue: $30,000 · OtherNevada County Search RescueLaPorte Fire Protection District: $20,000 · OtherLaPorte Fire Protection DistrictSutter Auburn Faith Hospital Founda: $10,000 · OtherSutter Auburn Faith Hospital FoundaWildlife Preservation Climate Resea: $10,000 · OtherWildlife Preservation Climate ReseaPlacer 10-35 Foundation: $8,500 · OtherPlacer 10-35 FoundationCity of Grass Valley: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $4,500 · OtherANEW DAY: $45,000 · ReligionANEW DAYSierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation: $20,660 · HealthSierra Nev…FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthFRONTLINE …BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $20,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT FU…RUDIGER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Public BenefitSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$138,362Religion$45,000Health$22,660Human Services$20,000Public Benefit$15,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANEW DAY: $45,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetSierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation: $20,660 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRUDIGER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANEW DAY ↗
  • Who funds Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds RUDIGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mike & Evelyn Walsh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mike & Evelyn Walsh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mike & Evelyn Walsh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mike & Evelyn Walsh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike & Evelyn Walsh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph