Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mike and Beth Diem Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$258k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Mike and Beth Diem Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
4
’21
1
’22
2
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$258kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$1kYouth Development$1kCommunity Improvement$1kEnvironment$1kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $250k+1 grant · $258k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$257,915
NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS TOOL LIBRARY$1,000
CHILDS PLAY$1,000
ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC$1,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$122
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $1k → 7%ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artprize Grand Rapids

Artprize allows for open citywide contemporary art experiences that encourage critical discourse, celebrate artists, transform urban space and promote cultural understanding.

Arts & Culture
2
Creative Enterprise Zone

The creative enterprise zone's (cez's) mission is to attract and support creative people and businesses to makeithere cezmsp. located between prior avenue and the boundary between minneapolis and saint paul along the green line, we…

Community Improvement
3
Duluth Art Institute Assoc

Recognize, validate and support the creation of art in all forms and encourage participation and appreciation for arts in duluth, mn

Arts & Culture
4
Northwest Minnesota Arts Council

Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Central Minnesota Arts Board

To promote and enhance the creation, performance, and appreciation of the arts in the minnesota counties of benton, sherburne, stearns and wright by providing grants and services to arts and community organizations, cities, schools and…

—
6
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
7
Rochester Art Center

Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…

Arts & Culture
8
Ne Sculpture Gallery Factory

To support the cultivation of art and artists in our community, both through programs and spaces at ne sculpture, and through the public art initiatives in the broader ne minneapolis area.

Arts & Culture
9
Chicago Public Art Group

Chicago public art group brings artists and communities together to produce high-quality public art, extending and transforming the tradition of collaborative, community-involved public artwork.

Arts & Culture
10
Atlanta Contempory Art Center Inc

Dedicated to the creation, presentation and advancement of contemporary art through its exhibitions, educational programming and studio art program.

Arts & Culture
11
South Bay Artist Collective

The south bay artist collective's mission as a 501(c)3 non-profit is to support and grow the local visual arts community through creating a destination for art and creativity, while teaching and inspiring youth. our purpose is to support…

Arts & Culture
12
Sioux Falls Arts Council

Our mission is to enrich sioux falls culture, economy, and opportunity by building a stronger and more vibrant arts community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public Art Saint Paul; the most unlike its peers is Northeast Minneapolis Tool Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $258,037 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCARTREACH ST CROIX: $3,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC ART SAINT PAUL: $1,000 · Arts & CultureEAST SIDE ARTS COUNCIL: $500 · Arts & CultureABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHILD'S PLAY: $1,000 · HealthSOLARBUDDY INC: $1,000 · InternationalSCORE Association: $1,000 · OtherNORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS TOOL LIBRARY: $1,000 · OtherDULUTH COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM: $1,000 · OtherART BUDDIES: $1,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$258,037Arts & Culture$4,500Human Services$2,000Health$1,000International$1,000Other$3,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $258,037 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTREACH ST CROIX: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD'S PLAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLARBUDDY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSCORE Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC ART SAINT PAUL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetART BUDDIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS TOOL LIBRARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDULUTH COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEAST SIDE ARTS COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mike and Beth Diem Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mike and Beth Diem Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike and Beth Diem’s filings →

    More from the funding graph