Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Middendorf Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$2.8MHuman Services$1.0MAnimals$485kEnvironment$390kCommunity Improvement$355kPhilanthropy$200kRecreation & Sports$200kHealth$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $900k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSIONARY SOCIETY SALESIAN SISTERS$325,000
OUR LADY OF MISSISSIPPI VALLEY$150,000
SANIBEL CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$125,000
FISH OF SANIBEL$125,000
KATIE'S HOUSE INC$125,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING AND RESOURCES INC$100,000
DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY$75,000
SANIBEL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINATTI ATHLETICS$75,000
UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY$50,000
CLINIC FOR REHAB OF WILDLIFE$25,000
MAYO CLINIC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $705k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KATIES HOUSE INCORPORATED: $100k → 6%FISH OF SANIBEL: $150k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $125k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $100k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $50k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $50k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $50k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $50k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
OH
NJ
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 12 repeat orgs$770k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$4.9M
$670k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $605k · revenue +111%
  • SC
    SANIBEL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $355k · revenue +45%
  • SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE
    one grant, 2018 · $225k
  • MS
    MISSIONARY SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $145k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE MISSISSIPPI ABBEY TRAPPISTINE NUNS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanibel & Captiva Island Association of Realtors Inc

The sanibel & captiva islands association of realtors is the trusted voice and advocate for real estate. real estate professionals adding value to our community.

—
2
Charitable Foundation of the Islands Inc

As a public grantmaking charity serving the islands of sanibel and captiva, our mission is to inspire philanthropy, leadership and collaboration for the vitality of the island communnity.

Community Improvement
3
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
4
Captiva Civic Association Inc

Improvements of a civic nature to residents and visitors of captiva florida

—
5
Saint Leo University Inc

Saint leo is an inventive global catholic liberal arts university thatfosters a personal & inclusive community which educates, prepares, &develops students for success, and consists of diverse learners whoboldly confront the challenges of…

Education
6
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Sanibel Captiva Islands Chamber of Commerce Inc

To promote the prosperity of our members and preserve the quality of life in our community.

Community Improvement
9
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
10
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
11
Florida International University Foundation Inc

To encourage, solicit, receive and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational and charitable purposes, all for the advancement of florida international university and its objectives (see schedule o for…

Education
12
Community First Credit Union of Florida

Community first credit union of florida's mission is to provide the highest in quality financial solutions for every stage of life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Katie's House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSIONARY SOCIETY SALESIAN SISTERS: $1,635,000 · OtherMISSIONARY SOCIETY SALESIAN SISTERSOUR LADY OF MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $700,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF MISSISSIPPI VALLEYKATIE'S HOUSE INC: $295,000 · OtherKATIE'S HOUSE INCOUR LADY OF THE: $225,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF THEUNIVERSITY OF CINCINATTI ATHLETICS: $200,000 · OtherCLINIC FOR REHAB OF WILDLIFE: $200,000 · OtherMISSIONARY SOCIETY: $145,000 · Other+9 more: $390,000 · Other+9 moreFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $605,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIB…KATIE'S HOUSE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesKATIE'S HOUSE…SANIBEL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $355,000 · Recreation & SportsSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $320,000 · EnvironmentDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $285,000 · AnimalsThe United Way of Lee County Inc: $175,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Housing and Resources Inc: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,790,000Human Services$705,000Recreation & Sports$355,000Environment$320,000Animals$285,000Philanthropy$225,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $605,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetSANIBEL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $355,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $320,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $285,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc: $175,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Housing and Resources Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKATIE'S HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANIBEL SEA SCHOOL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The United Way of Lee County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Housing and Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds KATIE'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL SEA SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Middendorf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Middendorf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Middendorf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph