Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$357kHealth$301kInternational$88kReligion$34kHuman Services$18kCrime & Legal$17kPhilanthropy$10kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $153k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$40,000
BRADLEY UNIVERSITY$33,333
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$30,000
THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC$15,000
MARIST HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
ERIKAS LIGHTHOUSE A BEACON OF HOPE FOR ADOLESCENT$10,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
MARIST BROTHERS$2,500
IC CATHOLIC PREP$2,500
CHICAGO CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPEN HEART MAGIC: $500 → 14%OPEN HEART MAGIC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
MD
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$732k · 21 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$732k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
0%

Still filing today

48%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +140%
  • BU
    BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +5%
  • EL
    Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +346%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CO
    CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
7
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
8
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Candor Health Education; the most unlike its peers is Lemars Community Theatre Inc Britton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $245,000 · OtherMARIST HIGH SCHOOLJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONA: $120,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONACROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $30,000 · OtherCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICACROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA - ILLINOIS: $21,000 · OtherDELTA UPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherMARIST BROTHERS: $17,500 · Other+15 more: $67,000 · Other+15 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $70,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $36,500 · HealthErikas Lighthouse…CANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $10,000 · HealthCANDOR HEALTH EDU…HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $5,600 · HealthTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $87,000 · InternationalTHE IRISH A…BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $67,666 · EducationBRADLEY U…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $16,500 · Crime & LegalBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $5,000 · Environment
Other$520,500Health$127,100International$87,000Education$68,666Crime & Legal$16,500Philanthropy$10,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $87,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $67,666 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $36,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetDELTA UPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $16,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG: $15,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAPERTURE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL BRIAN GUSLOFF FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetOPEN HEART MAGIC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗
  • Who funds DELTA UPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG ↗
  • Who funds CANDOR HEALTH EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds APERTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL BRIAN GUSLOFF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART MAGIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN AGORA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEMARS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC BRITTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL15.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Baxter International Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael J and Carla J Kilbane Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph