Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$742kEnvironment$29kArts & Culture$20k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAY AREA CENTER FOR WALDORF TEACHER TRAINING (BACWTT)$14,000
SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE$14,000
DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL$9,000
CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
THE FIBER CRAFT STUDIO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHRISTINA DE LA PENA$4,000
THE NATURE INSTITUTE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,890
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,275
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIMBERTON WALDORF SCHOOL: $4k → 6%WALDORF SCHOOL OF SAN DIEGO: $7k → 11%Katie Montgomery co rudolf steiner: $5k → 12%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $23k → 14%DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $10k → 21%TAMARACK WALDORF SCHOOL: $5k → 17%CEDARWOOD WALDORF SCHOOL: $4k → 12%ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY: $13k → 9%elham simmons co THE SOUND CIRCLE C: $4k → 9%THE NATURE INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%WASHINGTON WALDORF SCHOOL: $5k → 8%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $11k → 7%WALDORF SCHOOL OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $21k → 14%DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $10k → 21%TAMARACK WALDORF SCHOOL: $5k → 17%ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY: $9k → 9%THE NATURE INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $8k → 7%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $19k → 14%DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $10k → 21%THE NATURE INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $8k → 7%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $16k → 14%DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $9k → 21%THE NATURE INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $7k → 7%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%DETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $8k → 21%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $7k → 7%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $14k → 14%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $5k → 7%THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (WISC): $10k → 14%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $14k → 14%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $5k → 7%SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE: $14k → 14%CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $4k → 7%Sunbridge INSTITUTE: $13k → 14%THE FIBER CRAFT STUDIO: $9k → 14%marcade claybon co sunbridge INSTIT: $7k → 14%THE FIBER CRAFT STUDIO: $5k → 14%THE FIBER CRAFT STUDIO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 69% of The Michael Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Michael Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$677k · 22 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
23

Total granted

$677k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+25%

Still filing today

32%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +12%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +65%
  • TN
    THE NATURE INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • MC
    marcade claybon co sunbridge INSTIT
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waldorf School Assoc of Seattle

The seattle waldorf school mission is: daily we strive to inspire learning, courage, and joy in the developing human being.

Education
2
Bright Water Waldorf School

Bright water waldorf school's mission is to cultivate creative minds, capable hands, and compassionate hearts.

Education
3
Whidbey Island Waldorf School

Our mission is to provide a waldorf education for children from preschool through grade 8, which nurtures and cultivates each student to develop their capacity to learn, grow, serve, and become a full and active member of the community.

—
4
Mountain Laurel Waldorf School

To build the foundation of a free human being. guided by the philosophy of rudolf steiner.teachers inspire insightful thinking, empathy for all, and a love of meaningful work.

—
5
The Waldorf School of Orange County

Providing academic excellence, an interest in the world, a love of learning and a sense of purpose in life, developing initiative, creativity, critical thinking and self reliance.

—
6
The Madison Waldorf School Ltd

The madison waldorf school is an independent day school located in madison wisconsin, and a developing member of the association of waldorf schools of north america.

Education
7
Waldorf School of Bend

Waldorf school of bend is a private school. the waldorf school of bend cultivates academic excellence through our experimental curriculum rich in the arts, sciences, and practical works. we honor each child's unique spirit by building…

Education
8
Minnesota Waldorf School

Minnesota waldorf school nurtures children's highest capacities of thinking, feeling and willing by cultivating a sense of truth, the power of imagination, and a feeling of responsibility for themselves and the world around them.

Education
9
The Bay School

The school provides alternative education based on the waldorf method which is dedicated to sound education standards. teaching the whole child to grow and learn in ways that most suit their individual temperaments and abilities, utilizing…

—
10
Ashwood Waldorf School

The school provides alternative education based on the waldorf method which is dedicated to sound education standards. teaching the whole child to grow and learn in ways that most suit their individual temperments and abilities, utilizing…

—
11
Waldorf Association of Portland Inc

Portland waldorf school educates children for the whole of life in order to uplift humanity. out of the insights of anthroposophy, the school nurtures the imagination, cultivates the intellect, and recognizes the unique spirit of each…

Education
12
Waldorf School Association of Boulder Inc

To operate an educational institution based on the integration of physical, social, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual growth.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Waldorf Institute of Southern California; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bay Area Center for Waldorf Teacher Training (BACWTT): $130,000 · OtherBay Area Center for Waldorf Teacher Training (BACWTT)THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $70,000 · OtherTHE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIADETROIT WALDORF SCHOOL: $47,000 · OtherDETROIT WALDORF SCHOOLTHE NATURE INSTITUTE: $29,000 · OtherTHE NATURE INSTITUTEEMILY BIFFS CO EURYTHMY SPRING VALL: $27,050 · OtherTHE FIBER CRAFT STUDIO: $25,000 · Other+37 more: $198,920 · Other+37 moreSUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE INC: $148,490 · EducationSUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE INCCENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $58,000 · EducationCENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHYCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $22,000 · EducationCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOODAssociation for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $12,000 · EducationTAMARACK WALDORF SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Education+3 more: $13,100 · Education
Other$526,970Education$263,590

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE INC: $148,490 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTHE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $70,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetCENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY: $58,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATURE INSTITUTE: $29,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTAMARACK WALDORF SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Washington-Waldorf School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN VALLEY WALDORF ASSOCIATION DBA CEDARWOOD WALDORF SCHOOL: $4,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIMBERTON WALDORF SCHOOL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNBRIDGE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALDORF INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ANTHROPOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD ↗
  • Who funds Association for Waldorf Education in San Diego ↗
  • Who funds TAMARACK WALDORF SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Washington-Waldorf School Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN VALLEY WALDORF ASSOCIATION DBA CEDARWOOD WALDORF SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KIMBERTON WALDORF SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Waldorf Schools of North AmericaPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Waldorf Schools of North America · Rsf Social Finance Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael’s filings →

    More from the funding graph