Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael & Lois Wilke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$100kHealth$58kHuman Services$45kReligion$44kRecreation & Sports$31kPhilanthropy$27kInternational$24kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$3,780
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN LEGION MCLEOD POST NO 47$15,000
NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA$10,000
OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
BRIGGS & BARRETT PROJECT$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
CHILDREN'S HOPECHEST$3,780
RCS TRIUMPH INC$2,500
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$2,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA$500
NAUW (NORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY)$500
Individual grant recipient$300
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE 360$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STANTON COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK: $25k → 8%GLOBAL ORPHAN HOPE: $20k → 13%BRIGGS & BARRETT PROJECT: $5k → 13%BRIGGS & BARRETT PROJECT: $5k → 13%BRIGGS & BARRETT PROJECT: $5k → 13%Briggs and Barrett Project: $5k → 13%Briggs and Barrett Project: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 8 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$118k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+6%

Still filing today

25%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA
    3× · 2022–2025 · $30k
  • BB
    Briggs & Barrett Project
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TM
    TeamMates Mentoring Program
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • LL
    LEIGH LEGACY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SC
    Stanton County Veterans Memorial Park
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sauk Valley Foodbank

Our mission at the Sauk Valley Foodbank is to help alleviate food insecurity in the Sauk Valley area.

Food & Nutrition
2
Stanton Community Foundation

To benefit the communitys economic vitality by identifying, developing and funding projects which will grow and sustain the Stanton, Iowa community.

Arts & Culture
3
Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc

Fight hunger in our community by providing financial, logistic, strategic, and food support to our network of local emergency food pantries.

Food & Nutrition
4
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
5
Valley County Health System Foundat

The foundation's mission is to seek, receive and administer donations and gifts for the sole benfit of valley county health system. our number one priority is enhancing and sustaining high-quality healthcare in central nebraska.

Health
6
Unum International Inc

UNUM International is a Christian nonprofit who seeks to address, educate, coordinate, and provide aid and relief to eradicate chronic malnutrition, physical and spiritual hunger, and illiteracy in Guatemala.

International
7
Ncs Hope Foundation

The nebraska cancer specialists (ncs) hope foundation is a nonprofit organization that seeks to improve the lives of individuals and families in the community and the surrounding areas who are impacted by cancer treatment.

Human Services
8
Hearts and Hope

To develop transformational relationships with the people of Uganda. To partner in the development of communities that would promote spiritual, physical and socio-economical transformation.

International
9
Food Bank of Lincoln Inc

The food bank of lincoln, inc. is a nonprofit corporation organized to meet the emergency food needs for the sixteen counties it serves in southeast nebraska.the food bank of lincoln serves as a key organization for receiving, inspecting,…

Food & Nutrition
10
South Central Community Foundation

To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
11
Warrior Food Project Inc

Our mission is to help Veterans and First Responders in the United States, their spouses and children, whose unfortunate situations have left them suffering physically and mentally, gain access to special veterans' programs and to educate…

Unclassified
12
Holy Innocents Childrens Hospital Uganda Inc

To build a hospital, surgical center and clinics in Uganda to treat children.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Nebraska Inc; the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 360. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TeamMates Mentoring Program: $100,000 · OtherTeamMates Mentoring ProgramNORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $30,000 · OtherNORFOLK FAMILY YMCALEIGH LEGACY FUND: $25,000 · OtherLEIGH LEGACY FUNDOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCHAMERICAN LEGION MCLEOD POST NO 47: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION MCLEOD POST NO 47CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherNEBRASKA DISTRICT LUTHERAN CHURCH - MISSOURI SYNOD: $10,000 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN: $8,500 · Other+11 more: $35,250 · Other+11 moreBriggs & Barrett Project: $25,000 · Human ServicesBriggs & Barrett Proje…Stanton County Veterans Memorial Park: $25,000 · Human ServicesStanton County Veteran…Global Orphan Hope: $20,200 · Human ServicesGlobal Orphan HopeST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthStanton Community Schools Foundation: $10,000 · EducationChildren's HopeChest: $3,780 · InternationalNORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$248,750Human Services$70,200Health$25,000Education$10,000International$3,780Philanthropy$1,200Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBriggs & Barrett Project: $25,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Orphan Hope: $20,200 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION MCLEOD POST NO 47: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetStanton Community Schools Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetChildren's HopeChest: $3,780 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE 360: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Briggs & Barrett Project ↗
  • Who funds Stanton County Veterans Memorial Park ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Orphan Hope ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION MCLEOD POST NO 47 ↗
  • Who funds Stanton Community Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Children's HopeChest ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds NORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE 360 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael & Lois Wilke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael & Lois Wilke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael & Lois Wilke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph