Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael and Linda Mewhinney Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$470kCivil Rights$100kFood & Nutrition$60kAnimals$32kHuman Services$23kRecreation & Sports$7kPhilanthropy$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$25,000
REMEMBER THE MAINE FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
NELSON UNIVERSITY$3,000
PRESTON TRAIL XMAS FUND$1,900
IGLASIA EL SHADDSI ICP$1,000
ELDORADO HOLIDAY FUND$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BARBY'S WARRIOR SUPPORT: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
AR
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 7 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
27

Total granted

$318k
$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Recreation & SportsEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2020–2023 · $228k · revenue +26%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2026 · $75k · revenue +105%
  • VG
    V G C FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +21%
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +0%
  • SS
    SHELTON SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Lone Star Conference

The mission of the lone star conference is to foster student participation and success among member institutions in ncaa division ii intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of each institution's total educational program. it shall…

Education
3
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide educational services, see schedule o.

Education
11
Duke University

To provide a superior liberal education, to prepare future members of learned professions, to advance the frontiers of knowledge, and to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Long Island University; the most unlike its peers is A Cure in Sight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southern Methodist University: $228,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $97,236 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUN…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $75,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY: $39,532 · OtherLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITYREMEMBER THE MAINE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherREMEMBER THE MAINE FOUNDATIONSHELTON SCHOOL: $24,450 · OtherSHELTON SCHOOLCAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RESEARCH: $20,000 · OtherCAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RESEARCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRADITION GOLF CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $12,905 · OtherCAESAR KLEBURG WILDLIFE RESEACH INSTITUTE: $12,000 · OtherTAMU KINGSVILLE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Other+20 more: $73,074 · Other+20 moreFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $100,000 · Civil RightsFIRST LIBERTY …DARBY'S WARRIOR SUPPORT: $20,000 · Human ServicesCADDIES FOR KIDS: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC KERRVILLE LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsALOTIAN CHARITIES INC F/K/A WESTERN AMATEUR 2013 INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsV G C FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyA Cure in Sight: $500 · HealthMARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $300 · Youth Development
Education$330,236Other$312,961Civil Rights$100,000Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$6,500Philanthropy$2,000Health$500Youth Development$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University: $228,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $97,236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY: $39,532 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARBY'S WARRIOR SUPPORT: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCADDIES FOR KIDS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetV G C FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC KERRVILLE LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetA Cure in Sight: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALOTIAN CHARITIES INC F/K/A WESTERN AMATEUR 2013 INC: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DARBY'S WARRIOR SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds CADDIES FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds V G C FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC KERRVILLE LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds A Cure in Sight ↗
  • Who funds ALOTIAN CHARITIES INC F/K/A WESTERN AMATEUR 2013 INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael and Linda Mewhinney Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael and Linda Mewhinney Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael and Linda Mewhinney’s filings →

More from the funding graph