· Private foundation
The Micawber Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN HIMALAYAN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| VPM MEDIA CORPORATION | $2,000 |
| GIVE HOPE 2 KIDS | $1,500 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| RICHMOND MONTESSORI SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| OUR LAUGHTER IN THE RAIN | $1,000 |
| LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE IN CHESTERFIELD | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN FUND | $1,000 |
| COLLEGIATE SCHOOL | $750 |
| ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $750 |
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION | $750 |
| ISLAMIC CENTER OF VIRGINIA | $500 |
| K DANCE INC | $500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -21% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Trustees of Princeton University6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +51%- UOUniversity Of Dublin Fund6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +10%
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +34%
Funded once
ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INCone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%- WCWOODSON CENTERone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -21%
- CFCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $750
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Repertory Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Give Hope 2 Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VPM MEDIA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The American Himalayan Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds University Of Dublin Fund ↗
- Who funds GIVE HOPE 2 KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OUR LAUGHTER IN THE RAIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds STUDIO TWO THREE ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carmax Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Robins Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The NewMarket Foundation · Massey Family Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Saunders Family Foundation · Commonwealth Foundations · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Herndon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Micawber Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Micawber Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Micawber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.