Skip to content

· Private foundation

The MDV Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$28kReligion$17kHealth$16kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$15kFood & Nutrition$13kInternational$6kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Lady Queen of Heaven$4,500
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$2,500
Team Gleason Foundation$2,500
Catholic Charities$2,500
McNeese Foundation Dr Sam Monticello Scholarship$2,500
Braddy Scholarship Fund$2,500
Wounded Warrior Project$2,000
Abraham's Tent$1,500
Boys Village$1,500
Second Harvest Food Bank$1,000
Food for the Poor$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Mercy Ships$1,000
St Martin de Porres Catholic Church$1,000
Boys & Girls Club of Acadiana$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Wounded Warrior Project: $2k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%New Life Counseling: $2k → 17%New Life Counseling: $1k → 17%New Life Counseling: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CO
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 19 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$83k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+12%

Still filing today

53%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +78%
  • TG
    TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +182%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • DN
    DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • CO
    Christus Oschner SWLA Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
2
South Miami Childrens Clinic Inc

Pediatric medical clinic for uninsured and underinsured children

Health
3
Gift of Life International Inc

To further the cause of world peace and understanding by facilitating free medical services, primarily to children suffering from heart defects and other similar or allied illnesses regardless of race, gender, creed, or national origin,…

Health
4
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
5
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
6
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier

The primary purpose of christus foundation shreveport-bossier is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health northern louisiana in its mission of extending the healing…

—
11
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Front Yard Bikes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Our Lady Queen of Heaven: $11,100 · OtherOur Lady Queen of HeavenChristus Oschner SWLA Foundation: $11,000 · OtherChristus Oschner SWLA FoundationDelgado Community College: $6,000 · OtherDelgado Community CollegeIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $4,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCSt Martin de Porres Catholic Church: $4,100 · OtherUnited Way of Southwest Louisiana Inc: $4,000 · OtherBoys Village: $3,900 · OtherABRAHAM'S TENT ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · Other+21 more: $26,500 · Other+21 moreDAWG Nation Hockey Foundation: $15,000 · HealthDAWG Nation Hockey …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEASON …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…NEW LIFE COUNSELING INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE COUN…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $4,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $4,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,500 · InternationalSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $5,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ACADIANA INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOWER PUMP GIRLS INC: $500 · Public BenefitFRONT YARD BIKES: $500 · Public BenefitTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 · Animals
Other$79,600Health$23,500Human Services$16,000International$9,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Youth Development$1,000Public Benefit$1,000Animals$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAWG Nation Hockey Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Southwest Louisiana Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE COUNSELING INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetABRAHAM'S TENT ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ACADIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONT YARD BIKES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERFIELD ACADEMY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Southwest Louisiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM'S TENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ACADIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds POWER PUMP GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONT YARD BIKES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The MDV Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The MDV Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on MDV’s filings →

More from the funding graph