Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$10MEducation$6.7MScience & Tech$4.9MRecreation & Sports$210kFood & Nutrition$75kCommunity Improvement$75k
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $3.3M
$75,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwestern University$110,310
Regents of the University of Michigan$100,000
Yale University$100,000
Regents of the University of California$100,000
Regents of the University of California$100,000
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center$100,000
University of Utah$100,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$100,000
University of Alabama at Birmingham$100,000
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine$100,000
Stanford University School of Medicine$100,000
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$100,000
Carnegie Mellon University$100,000
University of Utah$75,000
Regents of the University of California$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mass General Brigham Incorporated: $100k → 16%University of Minnesota: $100k → 11%Carnegie Mellon University: $100k → 11%Stanford University School of Medicine: $100k → 8%University of California Berkeley: $100k → 10%University of California San Francisco: $100k → 10%The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $100k → 11%California Institute of Technology: $100k → 14%Syracuse Uninversity: $100k → 14%NYU Langone Health: $100k → 17%Texas State University & Northwestern University: $100k → 10%U of Texas Austin: $100k → 10%Kimberley Tolias and Andreas Tolias: $100k → 16%University of Iowa School of Medicine: $100k → 15%Regents of the University of Michigan: $100k → 14%University of Alabama & Mount Sinai Medical Schools: $100k → 17%Washington School of Medicine: $100k → 21%University of Washington: $100k → 6%Marquette University: $100k → 17%Yale University School of Medicine: $100k → 12%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $100k → 17%Duke University Medical Center: $100k → 11%University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill: $100k → 13%Emory University and Georgia Tech: $100k → 13%University of Colorado School of Medicine: $100k → 10%University of Washington Medical School: $100k → 9%Marco Gallio: $100k → 14%Rutgers University: $100k → 12%Massachusetts Institute of Technology Brain & Cognitive Scis: $100k → 8%Gabriel Kreiman: $100k → 16%University of Minnesota: $100k → 11%Stanford University School of Medicine: $100k → 8%UC Berkeley: $100k → 10%UC Sanfrancisco: $100k → 10%The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $100k → 11%California Institue of Technology: $100k → 14%Syracuse University: $100k → 14%NYU Langone Health: $100k → 17%Texas State University: $100k → 10%Boris Zemelman & Daniel Johnston: $100k → 10%University of Iowa: $100k → 15%Washington School of Medicine in St Louis: $100k → 21%Marquette University: $100k → 17%Yale University School of Medicine: $100k → 12%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $100k → 17%Duke University: $100k → 11%UNC Chapel Hill: $100k → 13%Northwestern University: $110k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
NM
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neurosciencelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 46 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
63

Total granted

$13M
$5.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+44%

Still filing today

33%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $783k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    5× · 2019–2024 · $675k · revenue +51%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    4× · 2019–2022 · $600k · revenue +41%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $517k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of California Berkeley
    one grant, 2022 · $175k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
11
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

12
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University and the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 63 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%60%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
25/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Regents of the University of California — $766,500 · OtherRegents of the University of California+98 more — $13,065,913 · Other+98 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,141,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERS…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $841,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LEL…New York University — $675,000 · EducationNew York UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $600,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Techn…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $600,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUN…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $516,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $462,112 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYBaylor College of Medicine — $375,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineYale University — $300,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $216,500 · Education+5 more — $650,000 · Education+5 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $300,000 · HealthVAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $225,000 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $150,000 · HealthMax Planck Florida Corporation — $150,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $100,000 · HealthWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH — $75,000 · HealthThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $316,500 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $225,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University — $510,310 · Recreation & Sports
Other$13,832,413Education$6,378,112Health$1,000,000Science & Tech$541,500Recreation & Sports$510,310

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,141,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $841,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $675,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $600,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $600,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $516,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $510,310 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $462,112 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $449,913 over 3y, 46% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $375,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $316,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $216,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMax Planck Florida Corporation — $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
  • Who funds VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Max Planck Florida Corporation23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph