Skip to content
The McDavid Group Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The McDavid Group Charities Inc

We at mcdavid group charities support the educational goals of children and spouses of fallen law enforcement officers.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$179k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$919kEducation$875kHealth$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$30k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $319k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC$178,500
COMMUNITY FDN OF PALM BEACHMARTIN$140,000
NO FALLEN HEROS FOUNDATION$40,000
OPERATION 300 INC$30,000
THE CURETIVITY FOUNDATION$15,000
CPR FOUNDATION$5,010
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%OPERATION 300 INC: $30k → 10%POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOC CHARITY FD: $60k → 11%SOUTH FLORIDA COPS: $30k → 13%CPR FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $200k → 13%THE CURETIVITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%HONDA CLASSIC: $31k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $179k → 13%THE CURETIVITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH: $400k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $175k → 13%COMMUNITY FDN OF PALM BEACHMARTIN: $300k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $144k → 13%COMMUNITY FDN OF PALM BEACHMARTIN: $140k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $100k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH: $100k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $100k → 13%NO FALLEN HEROS FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $100k → 13%NO FALLEN HEROS FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $100k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationPublic BenefitHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +29%
  • NF
    NO FALLEN HEROES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +87%
  • TC
    The Curetivity Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • PB
    POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON CHARITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $60k · revenue 0%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue -61%
  • CO
    CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concerns of Police Survivors

Support for families of officers lost

—
2
Colorado Concerns of Police Survivors

The mission statement of c.o.p.s. reflects the strong belief that assistance, guidance, understanding, empathy, and hope for the future for the survivors of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty begins with a caring, prepared…

—
3
Concerns of Police Survivors Indiana Chapter

Indiana concers of police survivors cops operates as peer support network for survivors of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty as determined by federal criteria.

—
4
Cobra Back Foundation

Bring police and community together with a common goal of fun and learning

Community Improvement
5
Western Pennsylvania Police Benevolent Foundation Inc

Provide funds to Police Officers and their families wounded or killed or disabled in the line of duty for healthcare, funerals and college of minor child

Crime & Legal
6
Corporal Christopher Kelly Willis Foundation

Cckwf was formed to honor the memory of a beloved marine. we provide college scholarships to children of u.s. armed forces who have died or become disabled in a combat zone.

Philanthropy
7
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
8
Police and Kids Foundation Inc

The police and kids foundation was created to support families of florida 1st responders who die in the line of duty, provide equipment grants t o1st responders and to support children of tampa bay.

Crime & Legal
9
Pasco Police Foundation
Crime & Legal
10
Criminal Justice Policy Foundation
—
11
Los Angeles County Law Enforcement Trust

Supporting families of fallen law enforcement officers

Human Services
12
Unite Nationwide for Cops Under Fire Foundation Aka Uncuff the Innocent
Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community-Police Relations Foundation; the most unlike its peers is No Fallen Heroes Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $1,097,000 · Crime & LegalCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH AND MARTIN COUNTIES INC: $940,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH AND MARTIN C…+2 more: $35,860 · PhilanthropyPOLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON CHARITY FUND INC: $60,000 · EducationNO FALLEN HEROES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Public BenefitThe Curetivity Foundation: $30,000 · HealthCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS: $30,000 · OtherOPERATION 300 INC: $30,000 · Youth Development
Crime & Legal$1,097,000Philanthropy$975,860Education$60,000Public Benefit$60,000Health$30,000Other$30,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $1,097,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH AND MARTIN COUNTIES INC: $940,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPOLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATON CHARITY FUND INC: $60,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetNO FALLEN HEROES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $30,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropi…
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McDavid Group Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McDavid Group Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McDavid Group Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home