Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Matthews Salazar Imagitas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$310kHealth$204kEducation$160kCivil Rights$59kArts & Culture$56kPhilanthropy$53kRecreation & Sports$47kHuman Services$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $52k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$231k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$35,000
SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS$16,700
SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,500
SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SB$5,000
LEADING FROM WITHIN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION$2,500
CALM$2,500
PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INDIGENOUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TANZANIA INC: $14k → 11%ORKEESWA SCH: $5k → 10%INDIGENOUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TANZANIA INC: $8k → 11%COMMUNIFY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
WY
CA
CO
NE
VA
SC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$473k · 28 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
45

Total granted

$473k
$455k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+28%

Still filing today

57%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation
    3× · 2021–2024 · $39k · revenue +28%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS
    3× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +141%
  • TP
    THE PROJECT FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $29k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • V5
    VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS - DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED
    one grant, 2019 · $272k
  • SM
    SAN MARCOS ROYAL PRIDE
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
  • CATE SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
5
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.

Health
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
The Foundation for Santa Barbara City College

The sbcc foundation fuels the excellence of santa barbara city college by engaging the community, building relationships, and inviting the generosity of donors. the resources raised and managed by the foundation enrich college programs,…

Education
9
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
10
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

11
Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation

The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.

Animals
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Moxie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySanta Barbara Community Org…Supportive Housing & Servic…Performing Arts PresentersSocial Innovation PlatformsEarly Childhood and K-12 Ed…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr13%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr13%33%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,942

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS - DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED — $271,560 · OtherVARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS - DETAILS TO BE PROVIDEDSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SB — $41,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SBIndividual grant recipient — $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN MARCOS ROYAL PRIDE — $36,000 · OtherSAN MARCOS ROYAL PRIDESB MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $24,000 · OtherIEFT — $21,178 · Other+42 more — $197,288 · Other+42 moreLompoc Valley Community Healthcare Organization Inc — $66,700 · HealthLompoc Valley Comm…Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $38,800 · HealthSanta Barbara Cott…SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS — $33,900 · HealthSANTA BARBARA NEIG…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $12,222 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEAS…+4 more — $8,750 · Health+4 moreSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $50,540 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationCATE SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationThe Riviera Ridge School — $4,100 · Education+4 more — $3,865 · EducationTHE PROJECT FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES — $29,160 · EnvironmentLeading from Within — $10,300 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,000 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $2,250 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $2,000 · EnvironmentORKEESWA INC — $26,378 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $13,500 · InternationalGLOBAL INDIA FUND INC — $1,500 · International
Other$629,026Health$160,372Philanthropy$65,540Education$57,965Environment$48,710Human Services$31,378International$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLompoc Valley Community Healthcare Organization Inc — $66,700 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $50,540 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $38,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS — $33,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROJECT FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES — $29,160 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetORKEESWA INC — $26,378 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALM INC — $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $12,222 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeading from Within — $10,300 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget911 AT EASE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Riviera Ridge School — $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DEL HERRERO — $2,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilderness Youth Project Inc — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Volleyball Club — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL INDIA FUND INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOXIE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MARCOS HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB — $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetVNA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA REVELS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lompoc Valley Community Healthcare Organization Inc
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE PROJECT FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES
  • Who funds ORKEESWA INC
  • Who funds CATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds CALM INC
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Leading from Within
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds 911 AT EASE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds The Riviera Ridge School
  • Who funds CASA DEL HERRERO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA39.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Mosher Foundation · The McCune Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Matthews Salazar Imagitas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Matthews Salazar Imagitas Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Matthews Salazar Imagitas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph