Skip to content

· Public charity

The Masonry Foundation

To provide high quality education, conduct research for the industry, promote masonry careers, provide grants, and conduct other activities.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$176kMembership Benefit$149kCommunity Improvement$61kScience & Tech$48kArts & Culture$40kEducation$26kCrime & Legal$26k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $126,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $131,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF$50,500
NORTH CAROLINA MASONRY CONTRACTORS$26,000
ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL$25,000
MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF$15,000
MASONRY INSTITUTE OF TENNESSEE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $25k → 11%MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION: $13k → 12%MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF: $15k → 11%TEXAS MASONRY COUNCIL: $20k → 16%MASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $25k → 13%MASONRY INSTITUTE OF IOWA: $8k → 5%MASONRY INSTITUTE OF TN WORKFORCE: $10k → 14%MASONRY ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA: $15k → 13%THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $10k → 12%LANG MASONRY: $10k → 15%MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF: $51k → 6%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOC: $50k → 6%ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $20k → 11%TEXAS MASONRY COUNCIL: $15k → 16%MASONRY INSTITUTE OF TENNESSEE: $10k → 14%THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $6k → 12%ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $10k → 11%TEXAS MASONRY COUNCIL: $13k → 16%ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 4 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$243k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA MASONRY CONTRACTORS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $119k
  • AM
    ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL
    4× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +19%
  • TM
    TEXAS MASONRY COUNCIL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $48k

Funded once

  • NC
    National Concrete Masonry Association
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -51%
  • MI
    MASONRY INSTITUTE OF MICHIGAN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -1%
  • MA
    MASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Masonry Construction Industry Improvement Program

To improve, promote and service the masonry construction industry in hawaii.

—
2
Northwest Concrete Masonry Association

Northwest concrete masonry association (nwcma) continues to support its original goal of industry advancement by continual improvement of the manufacture, design, and construction of concrete masonry products and wall systems. it provides…

—
3
Masonry Institute of St Louis

To educate the general public, contractors, architects, and engineers in use of masonry products.

—
4
Concrete Masonry and Hardscape Association

The purpose of CMHA is to develop and expand the use of manufactured concrete product systems in the U.S. and Canada.

—
5
The Minnesota Concrete & Masonry Contractors Assoc

To promote and encourage higher standards in the concrete and masonry industry and to promote the mutual advancement and welfare of the members of the industry by engaging in education and programs on an industry-wide basis as to maintain…

—
6
Masonry Industry Training Association of Southern California Training Trust

The Masonry Industry Training Association Trust is an organization that supports and promotes training for careers in the Masonry Industry.Mission:To introduce and promote, to persons of all ages, careers in the Masonry Industry.To provide…

Education
7
Maine School of Masonry

School based on masonry skills

—
8
Natural Stone Institute

The natural stone institute's mission statement is: to lead, support, and promote a unified natural stone industry through authoritive information, education, standards, and advocacy. additionally, its core values include leadership,…

—
9
Metal Building Manufacturers Association

To promote the uses of metal buildings, deal with technical and trade promotional problems pertinent to the industry, publish information of benefit to the industry, and to promote the maintenance of standard specifications.

—
10
Careers in Construction Sw Washington
Recreation & Sports
11
International Council of Employers of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers

To improve the organizational effectiveness of union contractors in the masonry industry.

—
12
Rocky Mountain Mechanical Contractors Association

Rocky Mountain MCA serves the unique needs of mechanical, plumbing and HVACR trade associations and contractor companies in Colorado. The Rocky Mountain MCA team has more than 25 years of combined leadership in managing and engaging…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mason Contractors Association of America; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Masonry Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA MASONRY CONTRACTORS: $119,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA MASONRY CONTRACTORSMASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $50,500 · OtherMASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICANational Concrete Masonry Association: $50,000 · OtherNational Concrete Masonry AssociationTEXAS MASONRY COUNCIL: $47,500 · OtherTEXAS MASONRY COUNCILMASONRY INSTITUTE OF MICHIGAN INC: $40,000 · OtherMASONRY INSTITUTE OF MICHIGAN INCMASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $25,000 · OtherMASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INCNORTH CAROLINA MASON CONTRACTORS: $20,000 · OtherMasonry Association of Georgia Inc: $15,000 · OtherFCMEC: $15,000 · OtherMASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $50,500 · Other+5 moreARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $60,530 · Community ImprovementARIZONA MASON…THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $16,000 · Education
Other$447,500Community Improvement$60,530Education$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $60,530 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $50,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNational Concrete Masonry Association: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMASONRY INSTITUTE OF MICHIGAN INC: $40,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTHE MASONRY SOCIETY: $16,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMasonry Association of Georgia Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetMasonry Institute of Iowa: $8,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

NCMA Education Research FoundationVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NCMA Education Research Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Masonry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Masonry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Masonry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph