Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$309kHuman Services$287kEducation$96kYouth Development$79kArts & Culture$31kCrime & Legal$27kFood & Nutrition$24kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISTERS OF SOCIAL SERVICE$15,000
GOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER$15,000
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$15,000
EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF HOLY SEPULCHRE$10,000
MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY$10,000
PREP MINISTRY OF ARCHDIOCESE OF LA$10,000
DOMINICAN SISTES OF ST CECILIA$8,000
CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS$7,500
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JO$5,000
RACHEL'S VINEYARD OF BOWLING GREEN$5,000
CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION$5,000
ST THOMAS AQUINAS CHURCH$2,800
ST JOHN'S SEMINARY$2,500
CARMELITE SISTERS OF MSH OF LA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $5k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD INC: $6k → 13%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $5k → 8%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $8k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $5k → 14%MEND: $5k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$773k · 23 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +142% since the first grant, against +84% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$773k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+142%
+84%

Still filing today

26%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +279%
  • FK
    Father Kens Vineyard Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +159%
  • DS
    Deeper Still Upper Cumberland Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BEDE THE VENERABLE
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • PF
    PAULIST FATHERS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Filipino Cursillos in Christianity La
Religion
2
Burning Hearts Disciples

Consulting for Catholic organizations

Religion
3
Marian Outreach

The Mission of Marian Outreach is to reach out to those most in need who are hungry, need clothing or need a compassionate word of support, following the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. As a ministry of the Daughters of Charity, the Marian…

—
4
Diocese of California American Catholic Church

Exaltation of god evangelization of the world

Religion
5
Lay Brothers of Mother Teresa Lay Brothers of the Poor

To evangelize and feed the poorest of the poor.

Food & Nutrition
6
Mission of Mercy
—
7
Ignatian Ministries

Ignatian Ministries accompanies those who are called to a deeper faith by offering Ignatian tools, resources, and community for contemplative prayer, for hearing God's voice, for embracing the companionship of Christ, and for living their…

Religion
8
Hermanas del Carazon de Jesus Sacramentado

To provide pastoral ministries in the San Diego County Hispanic community.

Religion
9
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
10
Camino De California

The Camino de California is an all volunteer apostolate and movement of the Holy Spirit seeking the conversion of souls in California thru Eucharistic procession and pilgrimage centered on Californias missions.

Religion
11
Move a Mountain Missions

Move A Mountain Missions is a non-profit organization rooted in the Catholic faith and inspired by the healing and caring ministry of Jesus. It is our goal to provide genuine encounters with Christ through service to the most vulnerable.…

Religion
12
Couples for Christ Mission Fdn California

The organizations conducts Christian Life Programs, marriage enrichment retreats and conferences to strengthen participants Catholic faith as it relates to family life including relationships between spouses and their children

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immaculate Heart Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Aquinas College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOSCESE OF LOS ANGELES: $80,000 · OtherARCHDIOSCESE OF LOS ANGELESGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER: $77,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTERSISTERS OF SOCIAL SERVICE: $72,000 · OtherSISTERS OF SOCIAL SERVICEDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JO: $55,300 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOPAULIST EVANGELIZATION MINISTRIES: $54,295 · OtherPAULIST EVANGELIZATION MINISTRIESDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOSE: $50,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOSEST THOMAS AQUINAS CHURCH: $34,880 · OtherST BEDE THE VENERABLE: $30,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTES OF ST CECILIA: $28,000 · OtherPREP MINISTRY OF ARCHDIOCESE OF LA: $27,000 · OtherST JOHNS SEMINARY IN CALIFORNIA JACKIE ROTTER: $25,000 · Other+20 more: $182,845 · Other+20 moreMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $51,000 · Human ServicesMEND - Me…Father Kens Vineyard Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesFather Ke…THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $45,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION: $30,500 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROTHERS HELPERS INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $250 · Religion
Other$716,320Human Services$77,000Education$45,500Youth Development$43,500Food & Nutrition$4,000Religion$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $51,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $45,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetFather Kens Vineyard Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDeeper Still Upper Cumberland Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Father Kens Vineyard Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Deeper Still Upper Cumberland Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marjorie & Edward Illig Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph