· Private foundation
The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of THE MARJORIE & EDWARD ILLIG FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| SISTERS OF SOCIAL SERVICE | $15,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER | $15,000 |
| EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF HOLY SEPULCHRE | $10,000 |
| MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY | $10,000 |
| PREP MINISTRY OF ARCHDIOCESE OF LA | $10,000 |
| DOMINICAN SISTES OF ST CECILIA | $8,000 |
| CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS | $7,500 |
| RACHEL'S VINEYARD OF BOWLING GREEN | $5,000 |
| DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JO | $5,000 |
| CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST THOMAS AQUINAS CHURCH | $2,800 |
| ST JOHN'S SEMINARY | $2,500 |
| CARMELITE SISTERS OF MSH OF LA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +142% since the first grant, against +84% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +279%
- FKFather Kens Vineyard Inc4× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +159%
- DSDeeper Still Upper Cumberland Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +142%
Funded once
- SBST BEDE THE VENERABLEone grant, 2019 · $30k
- PFPAULIST FATHERSone grant, 2020 · $20k
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELESone grant, 2018 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Consulting for Catholic organizations
The Mission of Marian Outreach is to reach out to those most in need who are hungry, need clothing or need a compassionate word of support, following the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. As a ministry of the Daughters of Charity, the Marian…
Exaltation of god evangelization of the world
To evangelize and feed the poorest of the poor.
Ignatian Ministries accompanies those who are called to a deeper faith by offering Ignatian tools, resources, and community for contemplative prayer, for hearing God's voice, for embracing the companionship of Christ, and for living their…
To provide pastoral ministries in the San Diego County Hispanic community.
United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.
The Camino de California is an all volunteer apostolate and movement of the Holy Spirit seeking the conversion of souls in California thru Eucharistic procession and pilgrimage centered on Californias missions.
Move A Mountain Missions is a non-profit organization rooted in the Catholic faith and inspired by the healing and caring ministry of Jesus. It is our goal to provide genuine encounters with Christ through service to the most vulnerable.…
The organizations conducts Christian Life Programs, marriage enrichment retreats and conferences to strengthen participants Catholic faith as it relates to family life including relationships between spouses and their children
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immaculate Heart Media Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Aquinas College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
- Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Father Kens Vineyard Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Deeper Still Upper Cumberland Inc ↗
- Who funds BROTHERS HELPERS INC ↗
- Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Marjorie & Edward Illig Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.