Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Marilyn C & H Randall Stoke Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$69kInternational$30kYouth Development$12kPublic Benefit$4kHealth$3kReligion$2kEducation$1kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$317k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRAMPLED ROSE$7,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUB SAN DIEGO$5,000
SOROPTIMIST INTL SAN DIEGO$500
DEL MAR HISTORICAL SOCIETY$500
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$289
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$114k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +60% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$114k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+60%

Still filing today

38%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentPublic BenefitInternationalPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QB
    QUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +253%
  • TR
    Trampled Rose Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +25%
  • WA
    Wreaths Across America
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • VC
    VILLAGE COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +77%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE DEL MAR LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
6
HDIInc

HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.

International
7
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
11
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

Rancho santa ana botanic gardens promotes botany, conservation, and horticulture to inspire, inform and educate the public and scientific community about california's native flora. the garden is devoted to the collection, cultivation,…

Environment
12
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health Centers of San Diego Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF INLAND NORTH C — $25,450 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF INLAND NORTH CBOYS GIRLS CLUB SAN DIEGO — $9,500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB SAN DIEGOBOYSGIRLS CLUBS SAN DIEGO — $2,850 · OtherBOYSGIRLS CLUBS SAN DIEGOBEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherSOROPTIMIST INTL SAN DIEGO — $2,000 · Other+11 more — $6,050 · Other+11 moreQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION — $41,925 · EnvironmentQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATIONTrampled Rose Inc — $28,750 · InternationalTrampled Rose IncWreaths Across America — $1,243 · Public BenefitZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $1,200 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE INC — $500 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $100 · HealthCHILDRENS LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 · Human Services
Other$48,350Environment$41,925International$28,750Public Benefit$1,243Animals$1,200Health$600Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION — $41,925 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTrampled Rose Inc — $28,750 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetWreaths Across America — $1,243 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CHANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Trampled Rose Inc
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds CHILDRENS LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds SAN DIEGUITO HERITAGE MUSEUM
  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Marilyn C & H Randall Stoke Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph